“They can’t silence us either Pierre! Stay fearless! There is nothing to lose when you always act like a winner!” – SGT
The unfolding dialogue surrounding Canada’s Bill C-21 reveals a narrative far more complex and far-reaching than its initial mandate. Although designed to enhance public safety, this legislative move risks unforeseen ripple effects, touching upon our societal framework, shared global ethos, and historical continuity. However, the crux of this discourse lies not solely within the confines of legal firearm ownership but within the slow and steady erosion of an enduring societal equilibrium – a balance that has maintained the essence of our democratic society.
Throughout human history, shifts in power dynamics have often resulted in societal disturbances, leading to significant upheavals. Examples abound, from the ancient empires of Asia and Europe to contemporary geopolitical struggles. In many instances, such shifts often erode societal structures and norms that took centuries to cultivate. It’s within this historical context that we must examine the implications of Bill C-21.
An essential facet of this societal balance lies within our collective ethos, aptly symbolized by the historically ingrained ‘warrior ethos.’ This ethos, a testament to courage, discipline, and strategic acumen, has transcended cultures, epochs, and geographical boundaries. It found expression in the form of knights, samurais, Rajput and Maratha warriors, Spartan hoplites, Roman Legionnaires, Viking Norsemen, Shaolin monks, Native American warriors, Maori Toa, and continues in our present-day public safety services, intelligence agencies, and military forces.
Modern sports like the International Practical Shooting Confederation (IPSC) serve as living embodiments of this ethos. They stand not as mere recreational activities but as repositories of an invaluable philosophical heritage. They encapsulate the virtues of resilience, adaptability, stress management, and problem-solving under duress – skills that are critical for navigating the complexities of the contemporary world.
Despite this, the current discourse around Bill C-21, in its myopic focus on legal and administrative perspectives, risks undermining this vital aspect of our shared heritage. The proposed legislation could tip the delicate power balance historically maintained between administrative rulers and guardian warriors, leading to an over-centralization of power. This could catalyze an undesirable societal shift, potentially sidelining the warrior ethos and the values it espouses.
The implications of such a shift extend beyond national borders and touch upon broader global challenges. Our world grapples with multifaceted problems such as climate change, resource scarcity, the actions of rogue nations, water scarcity, mass migrations, demographic cliffs, and AI safety problems. These issues require a diverse toolkit for their resolution, and the resilience, adaptability, and strategic thinking nurtured by the warrior ethos are part of this toolkit.
Moreover, with the rise of automation in military and policing services, the role of the warrior ethos becomes even more crucial. The challenge lies not in defeating technology but in finding a balanced path where we can leverage technological advancements without losing our philosophical compass. It’s about preserving the ties to our philosophical and historical roots while forging ahead into a future driven by technological progress.
The deep-seated concern lies not merely with the alteration of the legal framework but with the possible erosion of the collective ethos that has defined Canada – and indeed, many nations across the globe – for centuries. The discourse must thus extend beyond the confines of firearms legislation to encompass the broader philosophical, historical, and societal implications.
Recognizing this, Conservative Members of Parliament have voiced their opposition to the bill, echoing the sentiments of many who see this legislation as a potential threat to our historical and philosophical continuity. The question remains: are we ready to allow a legislative measure to tip the delicate balance of societal dynamics, inadvertently undermining our historical ethos? Are we prepared to risk the unintended consequences of a potentially over-centralized power structure and unbalanced power structure prioritizing administrative rule without any guardian ethos rule?
This brings us to the crucial juncture of safeguarding democratic values while tackling issues of public safety. It is vital that we approach this conundrum with a comprehensive perspective that goes beyond the immediate legal considerations of Bill C-21. We need to ensure that in our bid to enhance public safety, we do not inadvertently diminish the philosophical foundations that have defined our societies for centuries.
Our world is characterized by rapid changes and escalating complexities. To navigate this landscape effectively, we need to preserve and foster a diverse range of skills and perspectives. The warrior ethos, embodied in activities such as Tae-kwon-do, Paintball, Airsoft, Sports Shooting, Hunting, and IPSC, offers a repository of invaluable traits like adaptability, resilience, and strategic thinking. It would be unwise to sideline such an ethos in favour of a homogeneous approach to societal organization and security under administrative management alone.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding Bill C-21 extends beyond the confines of firearm ownership and public safety. It serves as a symbol of a broader struggle – a struggle to preserve our historical and philosophical governance foundations in the face of change. As we proceed with this debate, it is crucial that we maintain a broader perspective and remain cognizant of the possible long-term implications of our decisions.
Indeed, the enduring equilibrium of society depends upon our ability to balance change with continuity, innovation with tradition, and safety with freedom. As we debate the merits and implications of Bill C-21, let us remember this balance and strive to uphold the philosophical governance foundations that have long defined our global ethos.
Lastly, if you’re motivated to act and voice your perspective, consider reaching out to the Senate of Canada to voice your concerns about Bill C-21.
https://sencanada.ca/en/senators/
STOP BILL C-21 – Petition Details – Change.org
https://www.change.org/p/canadian-government-stop-bill-c-21
For the Veterans and Rolling Thunder: Thank you for your courage, sacrifice, investment, personal risk and dedication. We won’t ever be able to achieve this status, but we are working on our Digital Veteran status by contributing digitally :).
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/akJGPuQS0eA?si=2fOIWEpLkvKtEenh
Related Reports and Articles:
Defending Democracy: Raquel Dancho’s Unyielding Stand for Canadians Against Bill C-21
IPSC and the Warrior Legacy: Fostering Global Resilience in the 21st Century
IPSC’s Last Stand: Shaping the Future of Firearms Policy
History on the Line: The Battle for Canada’s Identity
Charting New Frontiers: A Critique and Proposition for Canada’s Political and Aerospace Landscape
Navigating the Skills Gap: An Investigation into Administrative vs. Frontline Growth
In Search of Balance: A Case Study on Leadership Communication and Gun Control in Canada
Shield of Freedom: Gloria Alvarez, the Superwoman Against Socialism in the Americas
SGT Pro Tip: For solutions to similar national and global governance challenges, you might find this related report useful: Technology Not Taxes: An Intersection of Authentic Conservatism and Principled Technology
Related Videos:
Senator Pamela Wallin EXPOSING legal gun ban in 2022
In the Senate – Debate continues on C-21 (June 13-14th, 2023)
In the Senate – Debate continues on C-21 (June 20th, 2023)
VOTE: In the Senate (June 21, 2023)
Lawyer Ian Runkle speaks at CCFR AGM 2023
True North’s Andrew Lawton at CCFR AGM 2023
“Take Action!
Recommended readings and references:
“The Art of War” by Sun Tzu: An ancient Chinese military treatise that emphasizes strategy, tactics, and foresight. This book aligns with the discussion of the warrior ethos and the strategic balance between power and governance, offering timeless wisdom applicable to leadership and conflict resolution.
“On Liberty” by John Stuart Mill: Explores the nature and limits of the power that society can legitimately exercise over the individual. This book is relevant to the discussions around Bill C-21, particularly concerning individual freedom versus collective safety.
“Guns, Germs, and Steel” by Jared Diamond: Provides a historical look at how societies have evolved over time, focusing on the roles that tools, illnesses, and resources have played. This aligns with the article’s examination of historical continuity and societal shifts.
“The Republic” by Plato: A foundational text in Western philosophy and political theory, discussing justice, the order and character of the just city-state, and the just man, relevant to discussions on societal structures and philosophical foundations.
“Democracy in America” by Alexis de Tocqueville: Offers an early analysis of the American political system, reflecting on the balance between individual liberty and societal order, echoing concerns raised by Bill C-21 about democratic values.
“The Better Angels of Our Nature” by Steven Pinker: Argues that violence in societies has declined over long periods, which can be juxtaposed against the motivations for Bill C-21 and the role of firearms in society.
“Leadership” by James MacGregor Burns: Discusses the nature of leadership in various settings, including political, and can provide insights into the leadership responses to societal fears and legislative actions like Bill C-21.
“Civilization and Its Discontents” by Sigmund Freud: Explores the tension between individual’s quest for freedom and society’s demand for conformity, relevant to the philosophical and societal discussions surrounding Bill C-21.
“The Second Amendment: A Biography” by Michael Waldman: An exploration of the history and politics of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution, offering context that can be paralleled with Canada’s firearm legislation discussions.
“Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community” by Robert D. Putnam: Analyzes the decline of social engagement and community in the US, which can be reflective of the broader societal implications of laws like Bill C-21 on community and individualism.
To see our Donate Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com/donate
To go back to our Home Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com
To see our Instagram Channel, click https://www.instagram.com/skillsgaptrainer/
To see our Twitter / X Channel, click https://twitter.com/SkillsGapTrain
To visit our LinkedIn Page, click https://www.linkedin.com/company/skills-gap-trainer/
To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer
To see some of our Udemy Courses, click SGT Udemy Page
“Discover the future of learning with Skills Gap Trainer, where technology meets art, and education transcends boundaries. Our innovative curriculum in AI, blockchain, user experience, digital marketing, and more, isn’t just about acquiring skills — it’s about mastering the art of possibility in a digitalized world. By linking to us, you’re not just sharing a resource; you’re igniting a beacon of knowledge that enlightens paths in technology, leadership, and beyond, for a global community of learners. Join us in our mission to bridge the skills gap and shape the future of education. Together, let’s empower minds across Canada, America, Europe, Britain, India, and beyond. Link to Skills Gap Trainer – where learning meets innovation, and every click opens a door to endless possibilities.“