Uniting for Excellence: Pierre Poilievre’s Vision to Reshape Canada’s Future and Revive Its Legacy

Supporting any political figure, especially without decades of firsthand collaboration and common work projects to check out competency and value system, is a massive gamble. We did that before, and learned quickly to do a bit of research ahead of voting. The geopolitical game, domestic entrenched land owner interests, and global corporate alliances (aka the new western tech order), is tempting leaders of nation states worldwide to lean more towards global alignments or alignment with wealthy land owners who bought the land in the 20th century, often sidelining the required allegiance a country has in law to its citizens based on the framework everyone grew and was raised under or based on the framework that is promised to aspiring immigrants via the media mechanism.

But looking at Canada’s position, our economic strength isn’t just about tangible exports like products or services that we invent, manufacture or produce. We’re also talking about a wealth of raw resources and energy. Our terrain, rich with minerals and vast lands, might just be worth dozens of trillions or a lot more. Think how many 7000 square foot lots fit within Canada. A lot. And with global inflation on a significant moderate inflation rising trajectory, beginning to infiltrate and spread into developing nations like ours, this Canadian “hard asset” “land and resources wealth” will continually shoot up even higher in dollar value, till one day we will be counting the value of Canada in hundreds of trillions of dollars, if we don’t already. Yet, as Canada’s resource wealth increases, it’s national land and resource value continually increasing, due to the declining purchasing power or depreciating currency relative to hard assets that we own as a nation, it seems the financial well-being of its citizens goes in the opposite direction. There’s an funny dynamic at play, which seems to trick a lot of people: as Canada grows richer, and it keeps doing that as the land and resources continually increase in dollar terms, the citizens are becoming poorer. Which is why we see Pierre Rise. They want this fixed. As Canada gets rich, citizens go broke. Only when the nation assigns a portion of that physical built in wealth to the citizens, will the citizens be able to keep up with the rising valuation and rising real asset wealth of Canada.

For workers and business folks, economic downturns can be brutal. They’re stuck navigating the fragility of employment, often with little choice. But countries? Especially one like Canada, bursting with resources and with a population so small in comparison? They’ve got choices. Wealth is something that ‘a leader chooses’ in Canada, and poverty is also a choice a leader can make, and has done in this case. While an individual might not have tangible assets, a country like ours has an almost limitless reservoir of natural capital just waiting to be tapped. For Canada, wealth is a choice, dependent on the leader’s vision, and leader’s willingness to unlock some of the wealth for the citizens from the land and resource valuation held by Canada. However, it is likely the land owners that exist today will block this move at every legislative turn, so the real question that should be asked, “Will Pierre Poilievere go against pre existing land owners? and allow citizens who have little, to benefit from the natural wealth built and locked within the borders of Canada, instead of acceptiong a 21st century where half the population is a serf or a slave without ownership ability. And further, this is the second question people should be asking. And we are pretty certain they will forget this one, as they do every time. “Will Pierre Poilievre show global leadership, by working with other leaders around the world, so that when a natural project of energy or minerals is done, the people of that country get more than 200 million out of a 30 billiion dollar project? How about 2 billion or 5 billion from a 20 billion dollar project for the people? So that is the answer, projects and taking a fair share of the project for the nation the project is based in, at the global level. We don’t know the answer to when such a leader that is both a national star and an international star arrives. But out of all the leaders of Canada, Pierre Poilievere has come the closest to making commitments relating to unlocking the value/capital of Canadian land. So from that perspective, Pierre has achieved more than the other leaders of Canada, in terms of an ethical and moral standing and an engineering society of the 21st century standpoint.

Enter the Liberal Party, with their “de-growth” strategy and “control legislation”. This feels a lot like the playbook of the elites, who might be more about maintaining the status quo than pushing for growth. Leaders from humbler backgrounds, however, seem to resonate more with growth-driven policies, maybe because they’re more in tune with everyday aspirations.

Now, Poilievre is bringing something different to the table. He’s vocally and passionately making a case for a growth-oriented industrial and technological future for Canada. And when we’re talking about leadership, it’s all about playing the odds. If Trudeau’s chances of pushing “freedom legislation” or advocating for a “growth-based economy” seem near zero, Poilievre starts looking like a pretty good bet. Even a chance greater than zero that he could help Canadians tap into our nation’s wealth makes Pierre the favourable option.

Here’s the thing: this whole scenario? It’s like being in a war. And in war, yeah, you’re gonna take some hits. The question is, where and how bad? Some injuries you can recover from, others, not so much. Poilievre, uncertainties and all, seems to be our best shot at a future where Canada thrives. With him, there’s hope for a shift back to a traditional, stable Canadian economic model and a stable governance model as we had with all of the prime ministers except with the debts the Trudeau family has placed on Canada of hundreds upon hundreds of billions. In this war, while we might not have a fancy new hospital, having a reliable doctor .. might just be enough. A doctor might be all you need to make the difference during a war.”

.

@user-or2gs4lf2u “If he becomes leader of this country you may have to swallow your words. This country is becoming like south of the border. He will say any thing to get in power.See if he produces all that he is promising.I guess not, like most who have become leaders.”

@skillsgaptrainer @user-or2gs4lf2u  “Yes, the political scene is starting to resemble the “instability” and “political aggression” and “aggression towards citizens”, often found in political scenes in the rest of the Americas … North, Central, South America, and many European Nations, especially South Europe and Eastern European nations. Sounds like you prefer the way it was before, when we weren’t like south of the border. If this is the case, make sure to not change the country. The Liberal Party is changing the country to fully global demographics and an international rather than a national identity. This means, that our politics will not resemble the politics of the previous 22 prime ministers, but the new international and more tribal politics. Conservative Party would be more focused on nation state view of Canada, or how things were in the past, though we do suspect they will incorporate Liberal values as it makes sense and as it is reasonable and safe to do so, but most likely the adoption of Liberal values will take time for the Conservative Party to ponder and measure. Good things come to those who wait.”

Video: Meet Pierre Poilievre