Championing Progress: Danielle Smith’s Stand on Energy Sovereignty and the Quest for Equitable Scrutiny

 
@ajfhalfj “You gotta love all the passionate people in the comments that are all hyped for whatever this politician says, like if any politician worked for their interest 🤡“
 
@skillsgaptrainer  “We had the opportunity to watch two illuminating videos from Danielle Smith today. She conveyed her deep understanding of healthcare challenges and similarly, a profound comprehension of energy system challenges. It’s worth pondering: has the Liberal leadership ever really turned the public’s attention to the critical healthcare areas such as doctor shortages, excluding their mentions of vaccine health issues? And have they heavily championed energy projects that genuinely address climate change? Interestingly, their focus for years seems more attuned to non-criminals who happen to own guns, and the constant drumbeat of censorship laws.
 
In the current dialogue, it appears that the primary voices advocating for leveraging science and engineering to remedy healthcare issues and rejuvenate outdated energy systems belong to leaders like Danielle Smith. This observation leads us to the realization that we must hone our skills in discerning the subtle variations in speeches made by different leaders. It’s an oversight to paint all politicians with the same brush, believing that they all do not have an allegiance to the public or to the country in a similar manner. Some politicians, such as Danielle Smith, demonstrate a very strong allegiance to the public, and this is visible in the work tenacity, focus and good alignment with professional STEM viewpoints, standards and solution approaches.
 
Certain politicians, especially those emerging from less privileged backgrounds, often adopt a growth-oriented approach. They envision a version of humanity that is not static but is constantly evolving, reaching new heights, and aspiring towards the vastness of the sky. On the other side of the spectrum, it’s not uncommon to find leaders, particularly those nurtured in affluence, who don’t necessarily promote growth or innovative solution development. Their orientation is more towards de-growth and control. Their perspective on engineering is skewed towards creating physical or digital prisons and camps. To them, the resolution to most problems lies in exerting greater control over populations.
 
By fine-tuning our ability to understand these speech variances, we can become more adept at discerning the leadership archetype in front of us. Recognizing whether their approach is towards growth and STEM or leans towards de-growth and control is imperative. Our inclination is clear: we resonate with Danielle Smith’s philosophy, where she emphasizes the importance of understanding, consultation, and an astute professional judgment.”
 

@skillsgaptrainer “The media subjects Danielle Smith to an exceptionally high standard, scrutinizing every decision she makes with intense rigour. Despite this relentless examination, Smith consistently offers justification, explanations, and supporting evidence for her actions. It’s unclear if Canadian news organizations recognize that the public sees this microscopic scrutiny, especially when compared to the comparatively lax accountability the Liberal leaders faced over the past decade. The perceived double standard should be evident to many Canadians. Often, it feels as though the primary checks on federal leadership come from the citizens and Conservative MPs. This is our initial observation.”

 

YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/BTQmacvoFRg?si=1fXZ6VoJewakfXym  

 

Related books and resources:

“The Quest” by Daniel Yergin: Yergin provides an in-depth look at the global energy sector, addressing how historical energy patterns inform current debates and future directions, especially relevant for understanding energy sovereignty and policy.

“Sustainable Energy – Without the Hot Air” by David J.C. MacKay: This book breaks down the mathematics of sustainable energy, offering clear solutions and dispelling myths, pertinent to discussions on energy systems and climate change.

“The Health Gap” by Michael Marmot: Explores social determinants of health and how inequity impacts well-being, complementing healthcare discussion points raised by Danielle Smith.

“The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels” by Alex Epstein: Epstein debates the ethical implications of using fossil fuels, contributing to the energy policy discourse mentioned in the post.

“Leadership” by Doris Kearns Goodwin: Provides historical perspectives on American leadership, offering insights into the qualities of effective political figures, contextualizing Smith’s leadership approach.

 

To see our Donate Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com/donate

Support the future. Support Skills Gap Trainer.

To go back to our Home Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com

To see our Instagram Channel, click https://www.instagram.com/skillsgaptrainer/

To see our Twitter / X Channel, click https://twitter.com/SkillsGapTrain

To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer

To see some of our Udemy Courses, click SGT Udemy Page

 

“Discover the future of learning with Skills Gap Trainer, where technology meets art, and education transcends boundaries. Our innovative curriculum in AI, blockchain, user experience, digital marketing, and more, isn’t just about acquiring skills — it’s about mastering the art of possibility in a digitalized world. By linking to us, you’re not just sharing a resource; you’re igniting a beacon of knowledge that enlightens paths in technology, leadership, and beyond, for a global community of learners. Join us in our mission to bridge the skills gap and shape the future of education. Together, let’s empower minds across Canada, America, Europe, Britain, India, and beyond. Link to Skills Gap Trainer – where learning meets innovation, and every click opens a door to endless possibilities.“