The Illusion of Innovation: How the Liberal Party’s Appropriation of Conservative Ideas Are Ruining Canada’s Future

Follow @SkillsGapTrain

• Prefab Modular Housing: In 2024, the Liberals have finally acknowledged the potential of factory-built housing, an idea long advocated by conservatives as a solution to the housing crisis (since 2008, at the time of the main financial crisis of the millenial and Gen Z generation). However, their plan lacks the crucial element of unlocking vast tracts of Crown Land for development (of 10 million square km.. and so far they only gave the cities of Canada access to 0.25% of the land but kept 99.75% of the land for unelected global elites), which was the cornerstone of the conservative vision. By limiting land availability, they maintain the artificial scarcity that significantly hyper-inflates housing prices and benefits the wealthy at the expense of those struggling to afford a home. Initial Guess: To make houses 50% more affordable, the government could increase land available to Canadians from 0.25% of Canada’s land to 0.5% of Canada’s land.
• Land Supply and Economies of Scale: Increasing the land supply to drive down housing costs through economies of scale is a fundamental principle of conservative economics. The land made available to citizens for 50 000 per lot of 15 000 square feet, or 100 000 per lot of 15 000 square feet, can raise money to pay off the national debt and switch Canda’s economimc setup from “high debt de-growth” to “low debt growth“ economic setup. Yet, the Liberals’ half-hearted implementation, lacking the comprehensive planning and commitment to providing land from the public trust, and to deregulation (administrative office removal) needed to truly unleash the market’s potential, risks creating a bottleneck that perpetuates the affordability crisis and causes real estate hyperinflation in our generation.
• Japanese Factory EV car production factories (Toyota/Honda): Their announcement of Japanese-style factory housing is a blatant attempt to capitalize on a concept already well-established in conservative circles as conservatives like SGT have been pitching these ideas to Honda, Korea, American corporate business forums and Japan/Toyota, China, well in advance of of Liberal interest in this area (which Liberals have been opposed to for 9 years to factory production.). This lack of originality, combined with their historical resistance to promoting domestic manufacturing, suggests a superficial embrace of the idea, more focused on image than substance. They probably gave away Canada’s land too under the table to negate the benefits of the deal to Canadians.
• NATO Commitments: The Liberals’ sudden 2024 interest in stronger national defense and NATO commitments mirrors conservative calls for a more assertive stance on the global stage since 2017 and especially since November 2019. Look at some of the history of firearms and sports shooting debates and online publications on https://skillsgaptrainer.com (a bit is published there). However, their track record of underfunding the military, neglecting procurement of essential equipment, and prioritizing virtue-signalling over strategic action casts doubt on the sincerity of their commitment. (they failed not only for 9 years, but even during great multi-polar war around the world, they stood on the sidelines for 4 years. During great times of battle, they will fail you, as they do during great times of peace, or during tough time of peace.)
• Millennial and Gen Z Support: Their recent pledges to support millennials rehash conservative ideas for economic empowerment, tax relief, and reducing barriers to home-ownership. However, their focus on targeted handouts and short-term appeasement, rather than on creating a sustainable economic environment that benefits all Canadians, suggests a lack of genuine concern for the long-term well-being of young people. They only bring it up because of our struggle to highlight the forgotten generation. They were exposed, and they couldn’t take the risk that our articles and reports would do well before they had taken action to create a history of taking care of millenials, and therefore earning some capacity to demonstrate thoughtfulness about real world family needs; millenials and Gen Z. We won’t forget that you didn’t care at all for millenials and Gen Z for 9 years, and you stopped giving ability to “opportunity” for families to come together under a job and house, and give birth and create new children.
• Intergenerational Fairness: The shift towards supporting childbirth and family growth is a welcome change, reflecting a growing awareness of Canada’s demographic challenges. Your welcome again Liberal Party. However, their narrow focus on these issues, while neglecting the broader concerns of how to actually create a job that is under “professional category” and how to create “land distribution for millennials and Gen Z” and how to efficiently mass produce housing units and distribute by truck, it means this movement is just administrative words to win an election, and it suggests a politically motivated strategy designed to appeal to specific demographics rather than a comprehensive plan for societal well-being and inter-generational sustainable, growth economy, growth civilization, to advanced civilization standard that is truly aspirational, capable , and next generation.
• Bus Expansion: Their embrace of expanding bus services (one of the pillars necessary to solve climate change, that engineers would choose to solve climate change.. coincidentally the first engineers in Canada that the Liberal Party ever met were from SGT, via the process of photocopying ideas from them covertly while secretly and covertly suppressing their digital propagation, instead of choosing a path of team collaboration), a policy previously championed by conservative principles analysts like SGT, lacks the necessary commitment to infrastructure investment, natural gas HEV bus systems exploration in innovation and tech design, autonomous capability implementation for maximization of bus occupancy seat being filled, and efficient service delivery that would make such a plan truly effective.
• PM Trudeau even copied Public Transit/Housing plan of Pierre Poilievre and the net generation bus expansion focus announced right after a lot of our articles and reports were published on next generation transportation bus for climate change mitigation that we were in communication with the MPs about, and online as well. (Way to spend 2 years on firearms file and advertise a focus on climate change solutions to the public. The PM is really sharp and timely).

• Erosion of Public Trust: By presenting watered-down, poorly executed versions of conservative proposals, the Liberals risk creating a sense of cynicism and disillusionment among Canadians who are tired of empty promises and ineffective policies.
• Wasted Resources: Canada’s fiscal situation is precarious, with a mountain of debt and a shrinking economy. Squandering our remaining resources on half-hearted attempts at solutions that are doomed to fail due to a lack of understanding of the underlying principles will only exacerbate our problems and break a broken Canada one last time.
• Stifling of True Innovation: The Liberals’ continued suppression of conservative think tanks and organizations like Skills Gap Trainer (SGT) limits the diversity of thought, prevents access to real-world STEM expertise at government policy platform level, and hinders the development of authentic and effective solutions to Canada’s challenges.

To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer