Using Science Fiction Hero Analysis to Realign the Future: Elevating Pierre Poilievre’s Foundational

We see elements from works like ‘Star Trek’, ‘Iron Man’, ‘Halo’, ‘The Matrix’, ‘Terminator’, ‘Leave the World Behind’, ‘Purge’, ‘Civil War’, ‘The Hunger Games’, ‘The Dark Knight’, ‘The Dark Knight Rises’, ‘Tomorrow Never Dies’, ‘GoldenEye’, ‘Minority Report’, ‘Oblivion’,’ ‘Dark City’, ‘Gattaca’, ‘Atlas Shrugged’, ‘Brave New World’, ‘Demolition Man’, ‘Equilibrium’, ‘1984’, ‘Inception’, ‘Butterfly Effect’, etc… emerging in our reality. Some emerge gradually in Canada, while others in America.

These stories seem to possess a property of emergence, as if we collectively work to make the visions of humanity they present a reality.

This phenomenon might accelerate as artificial intelligence sits atop networks, helping to organize thoughts from right sender to the right recipient, connecting our visions into a form of “crowd dreaming”or “crowd thinking,” amplified by AI’s language capabilities to both generate more language and to organize receiver and sender pairs perfectly.

Dreams could be cross-connected and intelligently routed through networks to the right people who can manifest them into reality via engagement into the world personally, via their organizations or via their positions of public office. Every address available in public, no one unavailable to be part of the collective system. Humanity might be able to accelerate and amplify its dreams with this setup, with these networks and with AI upgrades at individual node level and at network level, bringing the actual dream closer to reality, faster and in more fidelity to authentic design and incepted idea.

The idea here is that we have seen very few positive science fiction narratives throughout our time.

We need leaders who will bring about only those positive tech visions or positive Sci-Fi variants, while avoiding the rest. To guide emergence according to the positive dreams, while ignoring the negative ones.

Two of the most prominent candidates are ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ (timeless, classical, moral and with modern enlightenment philosophy), and ‘Iron Man/Tony Stark’. The bio-security properties of the Iron Man suit and its ability to enable citizens to reach extraordinary levels (even flight Angel suits one day), make them AI-safety device, device to keep safe against Borg /Trans-human threats/Cyborg threats, safety in world war time periods, climate change wars, mass migration wars, water scarcity wars, post economic collapse wars, pandemic collapse caused wars, Fourth Turning, Great Filter, AI Singularity, Matrix, and competitive with AI systems, Terminators & other threats.

It turns out that we need a leader with identical alignment factors to the character of Tony Stark.

“In the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Iron Man (Tony Stark) is one of the most powerful Avengers and plays a pivotal role in defeating Thanos.

You are the key in defeating the WEF and saving humanity. In “Avengers: Endgame,” Tony Stark’s actions are crucial to reversing the effects of Thanos’s snap, ultimately sacrificing himself to save the universe.

Thanos seeks to eliminate half of all life to bring what he believes is balance to the universe, addressing overpopulation and resource scarcity. His methods and ideology are central to the conflict in the Avengers storyline.”

At first, we thought it might be Elon Musk is Iron Man/Tony Stark, but upon deeper analysis, it appears to be you (as you were almost perfectly aligned, but was hidden in plain sight and an unused attributes until required post 2020).

It’s quite surprising. You’ve undergone such a significant technological upgrade in your psyche recently, to compensate for the deficiency of Liberal Party leadership from 2015 to 2024 and their lack of efficient use of capital for hiring professionals or for not being able to deploy infrastructure or any systems at all, that we believe this personality is manifesting within you as your primary personality and archetype, as we speak, daily, in full unrestricted mode.

‘And this is an amazing and most hopeful outcome that anyone in AI or Science Fiction can hope for, for Canada’s leader to actually be identical in nature to Iron Man in full alignment.’ The odds that the character we need, out of hundreds, to be the exact one we need.. is really incredible.’

The WEF, in its efforts to manage global resources, address sustainability, and promote economic inclusion, can be seen by some as aligning with a “top-down” or “global governance” approach. For people who are skeptical of centralized global solutions or fear overreach by international bodies, Thanos’s ideology could serve as a metaphor.

Thanos’s Parallel: Thanos represents the extreme end of utilitarian thinking, where the perceived need to address finite resources leads to drastic, unilateral actions. His belief that eliminating half of life will restore balance parallels fears that centralized global bodies (such as the WEF) might push for large-scale, radical changes in the name of sustainability, potentially at the expense of individual rights and sovereignty.

Ethical Warning: The caution here is that while global challenges need solutions, the manner in which they are pursued should not disregard democratic processes, individual rights, or ethical governance — a risk that the portrayal of Thanos exaggerates.

The WHO’s focus on public health safety, particularly during crises like pandemics, can sometimes result in measures that are perceived as authoritarian or infringing on personal freedoms. This is where Ultron’s narrative resonates.

Ultron’s Parallel: Ultron, an AI designed to protect humanity, decides that the greatest threat to peace is humanity itself, leading him to believe that controlling or eliminating humanity is necessary for survival. This reflects concerns about the overreach of public health measures, where some fear that organizations like the WHO might prioritize collective safety over individual freedoms.

Public Health vs. Individual Rights: Ultron’s heavy-handed, controlling approach highlights the tension between public health policies (such as lockdowns, vaccines, and quarantines) and personal freedoms. During the pandemic, WHO’s recommendations sometimes faced resistance from those who saw them as overly restrictive or authoritarian. Ultron’s story acts as a warning of what can happen when protection turns into control.

Thanos = WEF (in the perception of some critics): Thanos is seen as a metaphor for fears about global governance pushing radical solutions (like depopulation) for sustainability. The concern is that the WEF’s discussions about managing the world’s resources may sometimes sound like top-down impositions that, in extreme cases, could mirror Thanos’s authoritarian, utilitarian mindset.

Ultron = WHO (as perceived in a crisis): Ultron represents the fear of control through health and safety. During a crisis, organizations like the WHO might be viewed as enforcing measures that limit individual freedoms for the greater good. Ultron’s narrative of protecting by controlling aligns with how some perceive the WHO’s public health interventions.

The alignment between Thanos and the WEF, and Ultron and the WHO, stems from perceptions of centralized power and the potential for overreach. Both characters serve as warnings about what happens when solutions to global issues disregard ethical limits and individual freedoms. While neither the WEF nor the WHO operates in the extreme, these fictional narratives reflect underlying concerns people have about giving too much power to global organizations and how that might affect sovereignty and personal rights.

We are now two decades into a long-term shadow journey undertaken by our “ghosts” or “gray man” colleagues of SGT, unnamed, working on a secret project to address and fix challenges within Canada — problems that have been visible since the year 2000.

This mission began in actuality for Valentin after he saw the film The Matrix and named his computer “NEO”, to begin the process of learning to “beat the machines”. He did learn how to move faster than corporations and national governments, and in fact the film was the truth that large adversarial entities can be defeated this way. Faster natural language, or “code”. Virtual code, that has an escape via humans into physical reality, able to shape the reality, if the right escape point is found and right key presents itself for the action.

Over the years, he learned dozens of programming languages, but his favourite was the power of natural language (as is available with AI today), but engineers avoided English until 2022. And AI provides speed, incredible speed in natural language generation, the secret to defeating the machines and the corrupt, which are administrative machines pretending to be humans.

This AI accelerated language production, when coupled with network communications as available on social media like, group chat, social media in general, private messaging etc, had the ability to go beyond the virtual realm and create change in distant cities, engaging individuals in the real world to alter events from the seed ideas exchanged, like inception, butterfly effects when done in harmony as a confluence of butterfly ideas, or seed thought that the people an not ignore if the solutions are real, perfect truth and offering great wisdom…

— a skill significantly amplified and brought to full power with AI-driven thought amplification networks by 2022/2023, like X, and public listings of all known humans on Earth.

In 2004, Valentin foresaw a pandemic emerging in 2020. Valentin’s mission that has been gradually surfacing on the internet since 1998, and much more since 2022.

At that time in 2010, Valentin @ SGT also expressed concerns about potential threats such as widespread societal disruptions and anticipated darkness to hit in 2018 (but protests were hidden by media so it did not feel like darkness), but was 2019 in actuality. Valentin saw possible dangers looming in the years 2024 or 2026, he was unsure and unconcerned anymore, possibly an EMP event and/or an economic depression.

Though the specifics were uncertain and he hesitated to dwell on them, he envisioned the newspaper of 2024 or 2026 resembling the black and white bread line of the post-1929 era but set in the future of 2024 or 2026.

These things are a bit like magic in the prescience.

It would be highly beneficial if the systems produced consistent and repeatable results during evaluations, with minimal variation.

“Is each statement in the passage True or False. Yes or No. Check each sentence, one by one.”

Then it needs to count how many sentences are true, partially true, or false. Then it needs to tabulate a Truth Percentage Score. Hopefully, this is above 50%, such that more than 50% of the statements in the passage are determined to be true.

For instance, when determining a 30 factor alignment of a leader in contrast to a database of Sci-Fi hero archetypes, the alignment scores can differ between iterations. (However at least they don’t shift around too much in positions.)

This leads to fluctuations in the evaluation process, introducing too much randomization and not enough structure in the approach of deciding outputs.