EMERGENCY! Trudeau DISARMING Canadians
Video Title: The Imperative of Science in Firearm Legislation – A Methodical Approach
Link: https://youtu.be/PSj3oj5uzWM?si=jWETQ3rfEWkB0JP2
Scientific Rigour Over Emotional Appeals
In discussions around Bill C-21 and the May 2020 OIC, MP Dancho sets a precedent with her methodical and data-backed methodology. When forging policies with far-reaching implications, it’s essential to prioritize empirical evidence over emotions.
The Shortcomings of Selective Expert Involvement
While the testimonies of therapists and doctors who have confronted firearm traumas offer compelling and deeply emotional narratives, they risk overshadowing the foundation for comprehensive firearm policies. Their perspectives, rich in emotional depth, should be a part but not the entirety of policy formation.
Pitfalls of Over-reliance on Medical Expertise and Gender Biases
Medical professionals provide invaluable insights into the consequences of gun-related incidents. Still, there’s concern over their capacity to objectively correlate firearm ownership with criminal behavior. Basing legislation on these experiences instead of robust citizen metrics and crime statistics might skew policies. Emotions, potential gender biases, traumatic histories, and the narrowed lens of a first-responder can impact their holistic perspective.
The Indispensable Contribution of Diverse Scientific and Technical Expertise
For robust firearm legislation, the involvement of diverse experts is imperative. Engineers, applied science technologists, statisticians, data scientists, mathematicians, criminal science analysts, public safety specialists, and police experts can lend a comprehensive, data-driven outlook. Their training equips them to identify patterns and understand the broader context, devoid of the emotional weight of personal experiences. They can pinpoint key determinants of criminality, aiding in the creation of targeted legislation. Relying solely on the characteristics of firearms, rather than a citizen’s potential for crime, can lead to misguided policies.
Inclusion of a Multifaceted Expertise Pool
Effective legislation relies on the diverse expertise of professionals who bring comprehensive viewpoints to the table. Engineers, Professional Technologists, Applied Science Technologists, and Firearms Specialists possess a deep technical knowledge of firearms. Meanwhile, Professional Researchers, Statisticians, Data Scientists, and AI/Machine Learning experts offer insights into crime trends, enhancing our ability to predict patterns. These analytics can then be transformed into actionable legislation, minimizing the risk of licensing firearms to high-risk individuals. On the ground, Criminal Scientists, Sociologists, Public Safety professionals, Private Security experts, and Police share pragmatic perspectives on how to ensure enforcement and compliance. For a macro view, Military, Intelligence, and National Security experts contextualize the bigger picture, shaping the broader criteria for evaluations. Such a holistic approach guarantees data-driven, targeted laws without unwarranted biases. It raises a vital question: With such an expansive pool of professionals ready to bridge the gap between crime potential and firearm licensing, why do our legislative discussions often pivot solely on doctors and federal administrators? And further, why do they talk about firearms technology so much, which is an area not part of their professional training or personal interest even? Entrusting them to unpack the intricacies of firearms technology—a subject outside their domain and one they’ve shown little inclination to deeply comprehend—seems a misstep. Let’s bring in the experts from the other domains to untangle this mess.
Preliminary Analysis and Impression
Conservative MPs deserve commendation for their rigorous scientific approach to the May 2020 OIC and Bill C-21 debates. They stepped in to perform the roles of all of the professionals which were not involved in shaping this legislation; they had to conduct research, understand and explain data, and provide and present solutions. This has highlighted the need for a diverse set of expert perspectives on this file, experts that are not chosen to create a pre-decided upon outcome, but ones chosen for their alignment with the professional tasks required. Let’s not burden the Conservative MP’s so much, forcing them to be scientists, researchers, firearms experts, criminal science experts, engineers, technologists, simply because the federal government avoids the professional class involvement on this file.
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/vgrl1SII2C4?si=U3fcSOk5-Qb4jPiS
“Take Action!
Related books and resources:
“Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis” edited by Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick – This book provides an in-depth analysis of gun violence in America and discusses how evidence-based policies can help reduce gun violence.
“Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea” by Joshua Horwitz and Casey Anderson – Offers insights into how guns have been integrated into the American political landscape and the consequences thereof.
“The Gun Debate: What Everyone Needs to Know” by Philip J. Cook and Kristin A. Goss – Presents a balanced view on gun control issues, providing essential information and answering common questions to inform public debate.
“Shooting to Kill: The Ethics of Police and Military Use of Lethal Force” by Seumas Miller – Explores the moral and ethical issues surrounding the use of firearms by law enforcement and military personnel.
“Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and ‘Enemies of the State’” by Stephen P. Halbrook – While focused on a historical period, this book provides a perspective on the severe consequences of disarming populations and the importance of balance in firearm legislation.
“Firearms Law & the Second Amendment; Regulation, Rights, and Policy” by Nicholas J. Johnson, David B. Kopel, George A. Mocsary, and Michael P. O’Shea – Offers a comprehensive overview of the legal and constitutional issues surrounding firearms in the United States.
“More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws” by John R. Lott Jr. – Examines the links between gun ownership and crime rates, providing a statistical perspective on the effects of gun laws.
“The Bias Against Guns: Why Almost Everything You’ve Heard About Gun Control Is Wrong” by John R. Lott Jr. – Challenges common perceptions about gun control and presents arguments based on empirical data.
“Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America” by Adam Winkler – Provides a historical perspective on the Second Amendment and the American gun control debate.
“American Gun: A History of the U.S. in Ten Firearms” by Chris Kyle with William Doyle – Offers a cultural and historical perspective on the significance of firearms in American history.
To see our Donate Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com/donate
To see our Instagram Channel, click https://www.instagram.com/skillsgaptrainer/
To see some of our Udemy Courses, click SGT Udemy Page
To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer
“Discover the future of learning with Skills Gap Trainer, where technology meets art, and education transcends boundaries. Our innovative curriculum in AI, blockchain, user experience, digital marketing, and more, isn’t just about acquiring skills — it’s about mastering the art of possibility in a digitalized world. By linking to us, you’re not just sharing a resource; you’re igniting a beacon of knowledge that enlightens paths in technology, leadership, and beyond, for a global community of learners. Join us in our mission to bridge the skills gap and shape the future of education. Together, let’s empower minds across Canada, America, Europe, Britain, India, and beyond. Link to Skills Gap Trainer – where learning meets innovation, and every click opens a door to endless possibilities.“