The Canadian Polling Shift: A Theory of Engineered Consent & Elite Denial

Question for Canadians, Red = @PierrePoilievre

Title: “How does Pierre go from having a 93% chance of winning on January 14th to 40% today? Elections have to be fought for. Did he fight?”https://x.com/patrickbetdavid/status/1902866775651336624

SGT: It’s not about Pierre Poilievre’s actions at all, regarding the polling shift. Nothing at all. It’s about everything else other than Pierre. It’s crucial to understand that there are, in our view, four key players in this situation, and each plays a distinct, interconnected role. Isolating the issue to a single individual or party misses the broader, and potentially more concerning, dynamic at play.

A significant and rapid SPIKE in Canadian political polling across the entire chart, resembling a “moonshot,” is not a common occurrence. Especially towards an Un-Charismatic, Unknown, Old, Administrative, Globalist, Banking, WEF Associated, Net Zero Associated, Elite, Foreigner, Outsider, European; a category of individual that has caused pain to Canada from 2008 all the way to 2025. Not exactly the identity type that would make for easy polling changes; wouldn’t you say?

Especially given events of 2020 to 2025 and the anti Net Zero mood of the country today and the pro industrial pro resource mood and pro fiscal and economic improvement mood of the country that is the bread and butter of Poilievre’s 4 year platform, given that Canada’ rated as the worst economy compared to all OECD pears on Real GDP basis under Liberal Party track record.

Given the recent political history, marked by an extended 700- to 900-day “Blue Wave,” the phenomenon drew global attention from conservative leaders all over the democratic free world, struggling against significant left-driven censorship and tight control over both mainstream and online media systems, as was the case in USA as well.

Politicians from the United States, Europe, and Australia…

— prominent figures like Donald Trump and Nigel Farage and many rising in Europe on the right —

…were particularly amazed, often using his lines “this country is broken”, closely studying Pierre Poilievre’s approach and attempting to replicate his Wave with his points, that Pierre has been using since 2015, like “fix the broken country”. The polls on the right in Europe doubled as a result after the drive of his Blue Wave.. that created conservative freedom energy in political movements worldwide for years.

As a result, most countries around the world, have the economic and security policy that was originated under BLUE WAVE CANADA and look like Pierre Poilievre’s platform, and they have this platform on BOTH sides of the political spectrum now.

Title: “Blue Storm Rising: The Quiet Force Within” https://skillsgaptrainer.com/blue-storm-rising/

Title: “Blue Storm Rising” Master Report: A Comprehensive Framework for Alberta’s Industrial Miracle” https://skillsgaptrainer.com/blue-storm-rising-albertas-industrial-miracle/

Title: “Blue Storm Rising: A Canada-Wide Industrial Renaissance” https://skillsgaptrainer.com/blue-storm-rising-industrial-renaissance/

For example: Even the Liberal Party platform, Pierre’s opposition looks like Pierre Poilievre’s Platform, down to the wire.

Laurentian Canada appropriated scientific authority from professional STEM workers, enabling Trudeau to dictate what ‘the science’ was, effectively marginalizing and ostracizing those who disagreed. Mandatory vaccination became a precondition not only for employment but also for maintaining lifelong friendships, leading many to betray personal relationships, to group up 30 to 1 on people and offer them gate-keeping ultimatums. Individuals who asserted autonomy, self-worth, and respect for their bio-security rights were systematically isolated, excluded from professional circles, social networks, and even family ties.

Laurentian Canada STOLE the Valour of the military, by breaking the military for since 1990. To satisfy themselves that it’s not needed i their cimate futuristic global utopia.

Laurentian Canada STOLE the Valour of the labour workers and professional workers, by avoiding spending money on them from 2015 to 2025, and spending instead 9.05 trillion CAD on fake administrative office work for themselves (that uses no energy and does not produce a tangible output for the contract like an energy based product).

Laurentian Canada STOLE the Valour of the truckers, and did not acknowledge the truckers brought freedom, but hurt them and misrepresented their story to humanity. To satisfy Justin Trudeau and ave Justin Trudeau.

Laurentian Canada STOLE the Blue Wave from Pierre Poilievre because he contributed something unique to all countries on Earth, an they did not want a Conservative hero, so to satisfy their ego they worked the media system and eb system and the psy-op cognitive weakness present lifelong in Canadians, to output a change in polls.

Laurentian Canada STOLE the DREAMS of Milleanials and Gen Z to have a job and a house and a family and kids., to satisfy their belief in their personal understanding of economic policy, and sink the country so one generation they can show off as ELITISM. Show off with an office job that does nothing funded on national debt and the selling of industrial assets to Americans.

All of Earth became a copy of Blue Wave, but the credit was taken away from Pierre Poilievre, while every country on Earth used his ideas to fix their countries.

But in the WOKEISM age, the idea that MERIT and ACHIIEVEMENT would be acknowledged and be real, was a threat to the Laurentian creation. Pierre proved it was possible.

But Laurentian Elite Canadians, Wokeism Liberal Party voters were mean, and very jealous, and they wanted to hide Poilievre from all of Earth, out of jealousy, so they orchestrated the polling spike.

This is similar to Eastern European communism history in 1990, who also destroyed the national archives in 1990s of their best heroes, that would impress very very very much Western world, if they ever found out the heroes that existed there.

Politicians on the right questioned how Poilievre had successfully generated such substantial conservative momentum despite pervasive media censorship and significant governance control influenced by the World Economic Forum during the COVID era.

Who can defeat these web and media systems, there are hundreds of thousands of journalist and nodes and web filter, and yet he did.

This background makes the recent sudden polling shift highly anomalous.

Historically, support for Canada’s Conservative Party was characterized by gradual, painstaking gains, metaphorically described as moving “like a tank,” inching forward incrementally at a mere 0.25% at a time.

This slow, deliberate progress by Blue Wave implied that Conservative voters were deeply committed, their support based on thoughtful, long-term evaluation — or what might be called “deep-value thinking.”

Given the depth and stability of this hard-earned voter commitment, it is highly improbable that such a base would abruptly abandon their convictions overnight.

This implies that the Conservative support was HARD WON, built upon what we characterize as “deep value thinking” and representing a significant commitment from voters.

It’s highly improbable, in our view, that such a dedicated base would abandon their convictions so readily.

The “anomaly,” or “spike,” favouring Liberal candidate Mark Carney over Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, is therefore less likely a reflection of genuine, organic voter sentiment and more likely the result of a confluence of specific, potentially orchestrated events.

This is strongly suggested by the very nature of polling movement: voters had become “sticky,” their opinions hardened by years of debate and global events.

Yet, this “stickiness” seemingly vanished overnight, with polls shifting as easily “as Air.” This contradicts the established psychological model of a deeply entrenched and informed electorate. They had been debating since 2020, daily. They were certain.

Since global events of TREMENDOUS SCALE over the prior three years had only managed to move the polls by fractions of a percent, the sudden, dramatic shift to a 50/50 split, the impossible move had happened, but should have been impossible given human sentiment feedback system and mindset of skeptic and analysis people had been ready to withstand anything.

Down from a 93% projection for the Conservatives, is highly suspect. Such a level is so historic, it ranks in the top #1 or #2 most historic moments ever, not an easy trend to change naturally, unless there was an unnatural or artificial movement that was done or that people were susceptible too (such as a potential condition).

The polls appeared to “reset,” almost as if by a computer algorithm, and only after reaching this equilibrium did they begin to fluctuate more organically again. This strongly suggests external manipulation.

The sequence of events is critical. The prorogation of a House of Commons committee, effectively preventing Conservative MPs from engaging with their Liberal counterparts in an unbiased media setting (their only setting that is unbiased where TV clips can be attained for social media channels), created an immediate and significant power imbalance in the public discourse towards the Liberal Party (as orchestrated by Liberal Party to use the system against the democratic process, cancelling fairness).

This was immediately followed by a period of unprecedented and total media saturation by Liberal Party MPs, as part of the leadership race of Liberal Party (which was staged, as there was always the intention of voting for Mark Carney and no one took the Liberal MPs seriously as professionals after Pierre destroyed 36 Liberal MPs, the entire party and Justin Trudeau).

This was proven by the data, as over 90% voted for Mark Carney, proving the irrelevance of the Libeal Party leadership race, and proving suspicions that the leadership race was just there to monopolize the airwaves for a month or two, in order to create the engineered polling shift spike, according to our theory.

The Liberal Leadership Race thus acted as a means of “election interference”, a “pre-election election”, that gave Liberal Party two chances, while Conservative Party got once chance, a type of 2 to 1 game odds, to remove the fairness component from the democracy.

For the duration of the Liberal Leadership Race, multiple Liberal MPs, ostensibly engaged in a leadership race, appeared daily, simultaneously, across every subsidized mainstream media channel in Eastern Canada (thousands of subsidized journalists by Liberal Party, and a dozen media stations receiving billions).

These appearances were carefully crafted, taking place in visually appealing interview settings, with consistently favourable hosts and even friends of hosts, creating a supportive and echo-chamber-like environment.

In stark contrast, Conservative MPs were depicted in front of a closed wooden doorway, visually representing a shut-down government by Just Trudeau, as that small wooden podium is all they had aces to, while cineamtic events with European leaders were staged for Mark Carney (even if the crisis was with USA).

Concurrently, online traffic was demonstrably and strategically redirected. Narratives emphasizing war – specifically, the Ukraine conflict and the potential for conflict with the United States under a Trump presidency – were amplified.

⚡”ALERT: IRAN WAR IS IMMINENT, IRANIAN SHIP SUNK!? US WARPLANE NEAR NUKE PLANT, YEMEN IN FLAMES” https://youtu.be/hX15LTv-cFU?feature=shared

This coincided with what we describe as Justin Trudeau’s leadership ambition to deliver a “wartime” speeches, to be military commander of Canada , like a King, a goal he had seemingly been preparing for, as evidenced by earlier “mini war speeches.”, given to locations in Canada during COVID timeframe.

Liberal MPs adopted a visibly militaristic posture, undertaking frequent trips to Europe and war-related locations, dressing in Canadian WW2 green outfits, effectively saturating the Canadian public consciousness with imagery of conflict and crisis. We contend that this saturation reached levels that would astonish even 20th-century German propagandists.

This coordinated campaign, initiated in January 2024 with pronouncements on national security by Melanie Joly and Bill Blair, according to our theory, as a deliberate attempt to deflect attention from what we assess as a decade of deliberate neglect and weakening of Canada’s national defense capabilities by Liberal Party.

Title: “You’re absolutely right — Canada is far from ready, and it’s time we acknowledge the truth about our military capabilities.” https://x.com/SkillsGapTrain/status/1840141909857116275

Examples: The reduction in missile capacity for Navy ships (from a potential 128 VLS missiles per ship to a mere 24 VLS missiles, maybe 32 VLS missiles)

Title: “Ask yourself: Why would the Liberal Party choose a very lightly armed anti-piracy and humanitarian assistance ship…” https://x.com/SkillsGapTrain/status/1902198375010988061

and the critically low levels of ammunition reserves (reportedly only enough for three days of conflict instead of 5 to ten years), and accepting 4000 applications out of 66 000 per year, despite a high number of annual military applicants, hoping to shrink the military, which was done since 1990 alot. Military was far bigger in 1990 for only 26 million people population.

Title: “In the 2023-24 fiscal year, approximately 70,880 Canadians and permanent residents applied to join the CAF. However, only about 4,000 of these applicants were successfully enrolled, indicating that roughly 66,880 applicants did not proceed to enlistment.” https://x.com/SkillsGapTrain/status/1883688865816310165

The effectiveness of this strategy, hinges on a specific and deeply ingrained psychological characteristic within a segment of the Liberal voter base, particularly those we identify as the “Laurentian elite”, and the “administrative collaborators of the Laurentian elite”.

This characteristic is a historical and culturally conditioned reluctance to prioritize personal and national defense preparedness. This reluctance manifests, in specific attitudes towards firearms ownership and self-defense laws. It’s rooted in, and reflected by, policy choices that have restricted firearms ownership, limited self-defense rights (as argued by Justin Trudeau), and consistently underfunded the Canadian military, instead favouring what we describe as “Wokeism” weapons systems, ultimately rendering the country not capable of self-defense and rendering people not capable of self-defense. The very defintion of evil, to not the community, the nations and others in the country to defend themselves.

More than just a reluctance, we describe this as an active snobbery towards individuals, towards individuals authority levels, and towards groups who do prioritize self-reliance, emergency preparedness (“preppers”), and a strong national defense. This isn’t a passive disagreement, but an active, often vocal, condemnation of these values, manifesting as ridicule and dismissal and ostracism and banning form occupations in leadership and administrative public sector.

And then the POLL-SHIFT PSY-OP ACTIVATED THE CONDITIONED ELEMENT DESCRIBED

Faced with a perceived external threat, meticulously amplified by a controlled media narrative and online throttling (potentially by foreign agent corporations in American web corporations), this segment of Liberal voters, in our view, having this built in vulnerability of inability to handle national security responses, engaged in a profound act of collective rationalization and denial.

To acknowledge the potential validity of concerns about national security would be to implicitly admit the failures of their long-held beliefs and policies, and all the ostracism and hate they are responsible to sharing and distributing and pushing on to members of society or holding those beliefs.

It would require conceding that those they had previously dismissed as “paranoid” or “alarmist” might have been right, a concession carrying significant social and psychological costs within their tightly-knit social circles. They would have to hold themselves accountable for harm they did to truckers, preppers, soldiers, security minded individuals, the military, the police, and people who wanted to be strong with self defence in life, like the responsible firearms community.

They would have to have character.

They had failed to have character at COVID time frame. They failed with truckers to have character. And now they would fail the most important political movement invented in Canada in the last 50 years, the GLOBAL Blue Wave.

The manufactured crisis, therefore, provided a convenient psychological escape. By rallying around the incumbent Liberal Party – the very entity responsible for the policies now being questioned – these individuals could avoid uncomfortable self-reflection, maintain their social standing within their peer group, avoid admitting fault to their neighbours, and project blame onto an external enemy.

This, we contend, is the core driver of the sudden polling shift: a collective act of self-preservation, fuelled by a desire to avoid the social and psychological consequences of acknowledging a fundamental error in judgment THROUGHOUT THEIR ENTIRE LIFE.

The constant, intentional, and sustained media bias triggered the availability heuristic, making the Liberal narrative the most readily accessible and seemingly plausible explanation, despite its, in our view, manufactured nature.

The four key players involved — namely, the Liberal Party, the mainstream media, foreign corporate web traffic account managers, and segments of the Conservative Party who failed to effectively counter the internal dissonance that the Liberal Party voters experienced — each played distinct roles in engineering this polling shift.

At its core, the Liberal Party’s frantic push to alter perceptions emerged from a deeply ingrained anxiety about their own personal and collective inadequacies, particularly their lifelong fear of conflict, fear of combat, and fear of confrontation — whether it as fear of the United States, fear of combat with the United States, the fear of combat with the WEF during COVID, or fear of challenging Justin Trudeau.

This deeply rooted cowardice led them to project hostility onto ordinary Canadians who demonstrated strength, self-reliance, or a willingness to defend themselves.

‘Canadians who advocated firearms rights, preparedness, or robust national security were targeted precisely because they embodied qualities that the Liberal elite profoundly envied but could never attain.’

This jealousy, stemming from their inability to stand up to powerful external entities or internal political figures like Trudeau, manifested as a lifelong vindictive group based ostracism and gate-keeping campaign against anyone whose courage exposed their own personal moral and psychological weakness.

Therefore, in our assessment, the sudden and dramatic polling shift isn’t organic voter sentiment — it’s a calculated, orchestrated avoidance of accountability.

Justin Trudeau, Mark Carney an Liberal Party knew about the extremely high degree of lifelong cowardice in the Liberal Party Laurentian elite collaborator class, and exploited it. It was the deepest vulnerability, and no society on Earth had this vulnerability to as high of an extent and as high of a degree a Canada had, because Canada had never had a war on home territory in the living memory of people alive in Canada today.

It allowed these Liberal voters and elites to escape confronting a lifetime of errors, a lifetime of cowardice, and lifetime of betrayal towards their fellow citizens, towards their military, towards the millennial and en z they blocked from public service for having morality and inner strength of self defence, by clinging desperately to a fabricated narrative offered on a silver platter as an escape solution by Liberal Party manufatured and engineered to save everyone (themselves, as usual).

Related Content: