1) Evaluating the Collective Competence of Political Teams for Canada’s Future Means Evaluating Beyond the Leaders
The notion that the upcoming election is a simple choice between Marc Carney and Pierre Poilievre is a misleading narrative pushed by the Liberal Party.
If the Liberal Party has 153 seats or what not, and someone points at skills of Marc Carney, this is 1 person of 153 people, meaning that it’s only about 0.0065 of the total skill that the group represents.
If the Liberal Party has about 120 seats, then Poilievre represents about .008 of the total skills in that group.
Remember, with millions of people in the public sector, it is impractical for one person to directly manage or communicate with all 4 to 5 million workers.
Therefore, evaluating the capabilities of a single skilled individual, such as the Prime Minister, is insufficient. Instead, the collective skills of all Members of Parliament (MPs) under that PM must be assessed.
It is the combined expertise and network effect of all MPs — whether it’s 120 or 153 members — working together that drives the guidance necessary to mobilize millions of people effectively in the economy.
If only the Prime Minister is highly skilled while the remaining 152 MPs lack competence, the Prime Minister’s abilities will be rendered ineffective. Poorly executed directives from an unskilled team will undermine even the best leadership, failing to translate into meaningful action or results for the workforce.
The real contest is between the entire Liberal caucus and the entire Conservative caucus.
When we evaluate actual competence across key areas… — such as infrastructure, defense, public safety, business, the economy, and energy (the areas needed right now for 2025 challenges and beyond) — …most Liberal MPs have shown weak performance ratings, with only a few (a handful), demonstrating moderate proficiency in fields like innovation, national security, and technology awareness level & global awareness level (perception beyond Canadian narratives).
It is very possible that the Liberal Party performance levels are weak across most of the metrics, but for EVERY MP, and this is unprecedented, and we can’t believe that this could exist at any organization of such scale or even smaller scale, anywhere on Earth. Human incompetency, to be for 153 managers, in an organization of 153, this is insane.
2) Why Carney’s Banking Background Isn’t the Fix-All
In contrast, a significant number of Conservative MPs bring tangible, hands-on expertise across a broad range of critical domains.
These include mid-level to high-level competencies in areas essential to addressing both Canada’s current and future challenges.
These challenges often pertain to specific and 21st-century relevant areas such as global awareness, national security, public safety, economic growth (emphasizing revenue generated through tangible goods, such as manufacturing, energy exports, and resource exports, rather than banking profits), infrastructure development, innovation, and the restoration of ethics and morality.
Notice how all these things required are OPPOSITE of office work. Generally people specialize, one that is good in office work is not great in outdoor work and vice versa.
And Carney is likely not as effective on real world engineering or worker and labourer level problem solving challenges, as Pierre has shown deep interest in. Key skill areas include manufacturing (e.g., food production, housing, healthcare facilities, nuclear reactors, next-generation vehicles), energy infrastructure (e.g., pipelines and refineries), and large-scale engineering projects.
These fields are fundamentally distinct from banking, where the focus is on financial administration rather than the practical, hands-on execution of real-world initiatives.
No one needs to travel to Royal Bank or TD bank to do anything there. They can do things without Carney to help them. Nothing to fix there, except ethics.
To succeed in the 21st century areas, leadership requires not just administrative acumen but the ability to work with and direct individuals skilled in engineering, construction, and outdoor, field-oriented professions…
— traits often aligned with the adventurous, problem-solving mindset needed for tangible progress on national projects.
Have you seen how Poilievre grows into this role and how fascinated he is with real world solutions and tangible physical solutions that Canadians are waiting for ?!?
Some argue that Carney’s banking experience is a panacea for Canada’s economic troubles. However, the current crisis is not a standard banking or liquidity issue; it’s a crisis of real-world production and capacity.
The fake financial accounting that is done in banks, fake accounting and fake statistics, and fake equations, thats only for fixing prior debt problems.. but we’re at the end of that road folks.
Dry powder has been used up by Liberal Party.
Can’t fake our way out of this problem with digital manipulation of credit facilities.
The bankers got us into this mess. Banker PM Trudeau and Banker Chrystia Freeland did. And Banker Marc Carney is next in line to do the same. More debt and more Martial Law. Same old story. That’s what Bankers do. Lock-downs, Debt, and Military Martial Law for Citizens. They don’t have the vision and aptitude of the 21st century, only of the past. That’s why their Visa system was designed in 1960s and ts the same tech today.
Canada’s manufacturing output, resource development, and infrastructure are insufficient to maintain strong currency value, resulting in price inflation and scarcity.
Carney’s global financial credentials do not automatically translate into practical deliverables for boosting production… — building pipelines, building greenhouses, building refineries, building solar, building high-speed rail, advanced defense systems, and building housing.
Those projects require teams of MPs with technical, managerial, and operational expertise, and applied expertise, willing to leave the administrative office and get the millions for workers out there in the field, ready to troubleshoot how to mobilize Canadians to get the jobs done that need to be done.
Canadians don’t need more banking credentials.
3) Two Career Tracks: Insider Privilege vs. Real-World Merit
This debate reflects a broader issue in Canadian politics: the “insider track” that elevates individuals through elite networks versus the “merit track” where people prove themselves in competitive environments, delivering measurable results.
Many Liberal MPs appear to come from the insider track, boasting extensive resumes brimming with appointments and memberships but lacking real-world achievements in advanced manufacturing, engineering, or large-scale project management.
By contrast, there is a growing cohort of politicians — largely on the Conservative side… — whose experience is grounded in delivering tangible outcomes in the private sector, whether that’s project management, infrastructure, defense, or energy.
These individuals represent the merit-based track that focuses on measurable results over titles and connections.
4) Holding Leaders Accountable to Concrete Deliverables
Whether it’s Carney or any other potential Liberal leader, Canadians should demand specifics:
How will they enhance Canada’s energy independence and exports?
Will they build and expand pipelines, refineries, and manufacturing hubs?
Do they plan to invest substantially in high-speed rail, AI, robotics, and defense production?
What is their strategy to deliver affordable modular housing on a large scale?
Can they provide detailed timelines and output metrics for these initiatives?
If Carney — or any Liberal figure — cannot offer clear milestones and deadlines for projects that strengthen Canada’s sovereignty, economy, and infrastructure, then glitzy resumes and globalist accolades amount to little. Meanwhile, Pierre Poilievre has spent two decades building his profile towards achievement of PM role, and even in the last 4 years laying out a vision that prioritizes affordability, energy independence, and infrastructure expansion, positioning him as a leader with a more tangible track record. He has systematically discovered all of the flaws, and he’s piecing together a masterpiece as to how to
navigate the complex puzzle of fixing a broken epic broken complex system like Canada.
5) Conclusion: Focus on Teams, Not Just One Candidate, Focus on Physical Production, not Banking Credentials
They both have financial expertise beyond what is needed. We don’t need that. Everyone has financial expertise now. We don’t need that. We need to build build build and to avoid the international institutes and foreign armies.
Canada’s future hinges on an entire team’s ability to deliver real solutions.
Focusing narrowly on a Carney-versus-Poilievre matchup distracts from the core issue: the glaring difference between a group of MPs who excel in practical, results-driven fields and one that largely relies on inflated resumes and insider networking.
Comparing the banking credentials of two men, avoids the real skill of the other teams, the two parties, the 273, which is actually what powers the entire system of Canada to success or to failure.
This is called missing the forest from the trees? Seeing one tree, but missing that there is a forest? It is high time voters held every candidate — Carney included — to measurable deliverables, rather than settling for polished credentials without substantive follow-through.
Only then can Canada break free of an insider-driven cycle that stalls progress and undermines national prosperity. We need a document with the complete life analysis of 250 to 300 people or so, and then we can begin to compare them more efficiently and with value in the comparison. So you gotta try harder to find the best of the best. k.
‘Fix the broken countries of the west through increased transparency, design and professional skills. Support Skills Gap Trainer.’
To see our Donate Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com/donate
To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer