The Alarming Vulnerability of Security Systems: A Historical Analysis and Urgent Call for Quantum Blockchain and AI Safety Investments

Follow @SkillsGapTrain

98 of 100 security measures listed below have been individually overcome in history by humans. This article presents a thorough list of 100 security measures, along with “Yes” or “No”, indicating whether each has been overcome in history, followed up by a brief analysis, recommendation and conclusion.

Physical Security Measures

Air-Gapped Systems (Isolation from Networks): Yes

Faraday Cages (Electromagnetic Shielding): Yes

Secure Access Points (Controlled Entry with Guards): Yes

Multiple Security Perimeters (Fences, Checkpoints): Yes

Biometric Access Controls (Fingerprint, Iris Scans): Yes

Surveillance Systems (CCTV, Motion Sensors): Yes

Automated Defense Systems (Alarms, Automated Responses): Yes

Reinforced Structures (Hardened Facilities): Yes

Physical Tamper Detection Devices: Yes

Environmental Protections (Temperature, Humidity Controls): Yes

Anti-Passback Systems (Prevent Tailgating): Yes

Mantraps (Controlled Entry Chambers): Yes

Seismic and Vibration Sensors (Detect Tampering or Digging): Yes

Pressure Sensors (Detect Unauthorized Presence): Yes

Laser Tripwires: Yes

Acoustic Sensors (Sound Detection): Yes

Drone Surveillance: Yes

Perimeter Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDS): Yes

Security Fog Systems (Obscure Intruders’ Vision): Yes

Thermal Imaging Cameras: Yes

Physical Barriers (Bollards, Blast Doors): Yes

Security Dogs and Patrols: Yes

Metal Detectors and X-Ray Machines: Yes

EMP Protection Measures: Yes

Secure Supply Chain Management: Yes

Physical Token Authentication (Keycards, Access Tokens): Yes

Geo-Fencing and Location-Based Access Controls: Yes

Secure Disposal of Sensitive Materials: Yes

Anti-Tamper Seals and Indicators: Yes

Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Hardening: Yes

Tamper-Evident Packaging and Seals: Yes

Radiation Detection Systems: Yes

Biological and Chemical Threat Detection: Yes

Sound Masking Systems (Prevent Eavesdropping): Yes

Security Clearance Reinvestigations: Yes

Electronic Device Restrictions in Sensitive Areas: Yes

Security Awareness Campaigns: Yes

Strict Enforcement of Clean Desk Policies: Yes

Regular Security Policy Reviews and Updates: Yes

Seismic Isolation Systems (Protect Against Earthquakes): Yes

Cybersecurity Measures

Advanced Encryption Algorithms: Yes

Multi-Factor Authentication (Passwords, Tokens, Biometrics): Yes

Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS): Yes

Regular Security Updates and Patches: Yes

Use of Proprietary Hardware and Software: Yes

Data Diodes (One-Way Data Transfer Devices): Yes

Network Segmentation: Yes

Firewalls and Access Control Lists (ACLs): Yes

Anomaly Detection Systems: Yes

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Systems: Yes

Hardware Security Modules (HSMs): Yes

Secure Boot Processes (Firmware Verification): Yes

Application Whitelisting: Yes

Behavioural Biometrics (Keystroke Dynamics, Mouse Movements): Yes

Security Tokens (Smart Cards, USB Tokens): Yes

Access Control Models (MAC, DAC, RBAC): Yes

Sandboxing Applications: Yes

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs): Yes

Time-Based One-Time Passwords (TOTP): Yes

Security Education and Awareness Training: Yes

Hardware-Based Encryption Devices: Yes

Network Traffic Encryption (TLS/SSL): Yes

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Systems: Yes

Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR): Yes

Zero-Day Exploit Protections: Yes

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB): Yes

Blockchain-Based Security Solutions: No

Quantum Cryptography: No

Artificial Intelligence for Threat Detection: Yes

Biometric Encryption Techniques: Yes

Human Oversight and Protocols

Two-Person Integrity (Dual Control): Yes

Split Knowledge Procedures (Key Components Divided Among Individuals): Yes

Background Checks and Security Clearances: Yes

Behavioral Monitoring for Insider Threats: Yes

Strict Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Yes

Regular Training and Drills: Yes

Access Logs and Audit Trails: Yes

Mandatory Leave Policies (to detect fraud/irregularities): Yes

Rotation of Duties: Yes

Whistleblower Protection Mechanisms: Yes

Psychological Assessments for Personnel: Yes

Polygraph Testing: Yes

Mandatory Reporting of Suspicious Behaviour: Yes

Zero Trust Security Models: Yes

Segregation of Duties: Yes

Chain of Custody Procedures: Yes

Access Revocation Policies: Yes

Employee Monitoring Software: Yes

Third-Party Vendor Security Assessments: Yes

Red Team Exercises (Simulated Attacks): Yes

Security Incident Response Teams (SIRTs): Yes

Continuous Security Education Programs: Yes

Employee Background Reinvestigations: Yes

Ethical Hacking Programs (Bug Bounties): Yes

Behavioural Analytics for Insider Threat Detection: Yes

Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity Training: Yes

Phishing Simulation Tests: Yes

Access Control Reviews and Recertification: Yes

Strict Enforcement of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs): Yes

Compliance with International Security Regulations: Yes

Conclusion:

98 of the 100 security measures has been individually overcome in history by humans.

Blockchain-Based Security Solutions: No

Explanation: The fundamental cryptographic mechanisms underlying blockchain technology have not been broken. While specific applications built on blockchain platforms — such as smart contracts — have been exploited due to coding errors or vulnerabilities in implementation, the core blockchain protocols remain secure.

Quantum Cryptography: No

Explanation: Quantum cryptography, particularly Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), is designed to be theoretically secure based on the principles of quantum mechanics. There are no public records of quantum cryptography being fundamentally compromised. However, practical implementations may face challenges due to technological limitations or side-channel attacks, but these do not equate to breaking the underlying quantum cryptographic principles.

Further:

‘Overcoming a single security measure does not equate to the ability to breach a highly secure system like Russia’s Perimeter system.’

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1844313328560083009

‘The cumulative effect of combined security measures increases the difficulty of unauthorized access or activation, making such an endeavour unlikely.’

‘High-security systems rely on the principle of defense-in-depth, where multiple overlapping layers of security protect against potential vulnerabilities in any single layer.’

‘During conflicts between nations, leadership can be distracted or destroyed. Under such circumstances, nefarious actors could take advantage of the situation to send in AI agents to overcome such nuclear control systems, espcially since systems like Perimeter are autonomous in oepration (it is said), and such advanced AI/robotics configurations could overcome defense-in-depth configurations due the idea that humans were able to overcome 98% of known security system, and AI systems have vastly superior problem solving capabilities.’

‘However, certain security measures, quantum cryptography and blockchain-based security solutions, have not been publicly documented as having been overcome.’

‘We strongly advise nation-states and corporations to take AI safety more seriously. It is disappointing that some leaders have not demonstrated sufficient initiative in this critical area.’

‘Despite the urgent need for enhanced security, investment in developing a blockchain-based internet and updating global codebases to quantum-resistant encryption standards has not matched the rapid growth of AI and nuclear capabilities.’

‘While significant resources — amounting to hundreds of billions or even trillions — have been allocated to advancing AI systems and nuclear capabilities, investments in quantum blockchain and other protective technologies remain comparatively limited.’

‘Much of the innovation in blockchain technologies, which could secure digital systems in the age of AI, has been driven by independent developers and open-source communities, with less direct support from larger institutions and governments compared to other emerging technologies.’

‘These independent developers often work with limited resources and may not receive the same level of support as large-scale AI and nuclear projects. This reliance on voluntary efforts, while commendable, underscores the need for increased backing from governments and corporations to ensure robust security advancements.’

‘We urge leaders to prioritize the creation of robust quantum blockchain information systems and networks. By investing in these protective technologies, we can better secure our digital infrastructure and ensure a safer future in the era of advanced AI.’

Physical Security Measures

Cybersecurity Measures

Human Oversight and Protocols

Conclusion:

Related Content: