Blue Storm Rising: The Conservative Blueprint to Reclaim Canada

Follow @SkillsGapTrain

Introduction

• National Sovereignty & Security: Energy independence (LNG, SMRs), responsible resource management, protecting Canadian businesses, robust military modernization (jets, ships, drones, missiles, ammunition) (manufacturing), secure borders (tech & personnel), strong cybersecurity.
• Economic Prosperity & Innovation: Axe the Carbon Tax, fiscal responsibility (dollar-for-dollar law), strategic infrastructure (energy, transport), prioritizing professional STEM education & societies (CIPS, ASTTBC, EGBC, ASET, ITA), applied research, bridging the skills gap with targeted immigration, revitalizing domestic manufacturing (aerospace like in Alberta, defense, shipbuilding, advanced tech)(manufacturing), resilient supply chains.
• Societal Well-being & Values: Upholding free speech (anti-censorship), individual responsibility & meritocracy, national unity (anti-divisive identity politics), affordable housing (unlocking Crown land, pod/modular factories) (housing innovation technology funds, 3D printing, lane-way, prefab, modular), food security (empowering farmers, local greenhouses, supply chain independence with Rustad in BC, health gift cards, local city produce production), public safety (addressing root causes of crime, combating gangs, combating organized crime groups, combating borer crossings, shutting down drug operations with special forces, like Danielle Smith & Mike Ellis in Alberta or Doug Ford), emergency preparedness (national & individual), modernized “Special Rangers Expansion Project” force for border security.
• Environmental Stewardship: Responsible resource development, clean energy transition (SMRs, hybrid nat gas, renewables, lightweight materials), energy efficiency, large-scale reforestation.

• Core Message & Grievances:
  • Freedom of Speech/Bodily Autonomy/Medical Choice: The truckers’ fight against mandates became a powerful symbol of individual liberty and resistance against perceived government coercion on deeply personal health decisions. (Evidence: Speeches by Tamara Lich and other organizers; signs and slogans at the convoy; interviews with truckers.)
  • Economic Hardship/Cost of Living: The convoy highlighted the real-world impact of pandemic policies (lockdowns, mandates), rising fuel costs (exacerbated by the carbon tax), and inflation on the trucking industry and working-class Canadians. (Evidence: Interviews with truckers about lost income; economic data on trucking industry impact; social media posts highlighting cost of living struggles.)
  • Anti-Establishment Sentiment/Distrust of Government/Media: The convoy exposed a deep distrust of mainstream media and political institutions perceived as out of touch, unresponsive, and even hostile towards the concerns of everyday Canadians. (Evidence: Convoy participants’ criticism of media coverage; social media discussions; polling data on trust in government/media.)
  • National Identity/Sovereignty/Patriotism: The convoy became a powerful expression of Canadian patriotism and a rejection of globalist narratives, with Canadian flags displayed prominently and calls to “take back Canada.” This resonated with many who felt a loss of national pride and identity amidst evolving cultural and political trends. (Evidence: Imagery of the convoy with flags; speeches emphasizing Canadian values; social media discussions about national identity).
  • Direct Action/Civil Disobedience: While distinct from traditional political action, the truckers’ unprecedented cross-country protest demonstrated a willingness to engage in civil disobedience to challenge authority perceived as violating fundamental freedoms. (Evidence: The scale and duration of the convoy; organizers’ statements justifying civil disobedience.)

• Alignment with “Blue Storm Rising”: Extremely high alignment on freedom/rights, anti-censorship, individual responsibility, anti-establishment sentiment, national identity/sovereignty, and economic concerns. The convoy’s emphasis on direct action differs tactically from SGT/CPC’s focus on working within the system, but the underlying values (courage, fighting for what’s right, challenging injustice) resonate with the “warrior ethos” emphasized in SGT’s writings and CPC/Poilievre’s videos. This represents a deeper philosophical alignment beyond specific tactics.

• Impact:
  • Forced Government Response: The convoy became so significant that the government had to respond, even if through the controversial Emergencies Act, demonstrating the power of collective action and bringing these issues into the national spotlight. (Evidence: Media coverage of the Emergencies Act debate and its impact on public opinion.)
  • Shifted the Political Landscape: The convoy exposed deep societal divisions and galvanized a segment of the population previously disengaged from politics. It created an environment ripe for a political leader like Pierre Poilievre to articulate a vision that resonated with the frustrations and values expressed by the movement, thereby significantly contributing to his rise. (Evidence: Election results, polling data, analysis of Poilievre’s messaging and its resonance with convoy themes.)
  • Empowered Citizen Action: The convoy demonstrated the potential for grassroots movements to challenge established power structures and influence the political narrative. (Evidence: The scale of the convoy, its duration, media attention, and the formation of similar movements internationally.)
  • Alberta Resonance: The convoy received strong support from Alberta, reflecting the existing alignment with Danielle Smith’s focus on provincial autonomy, push-back against federal overreach, and the defense of individual freedoms. (Evidence: Media coverage of Alberta’s support for the convoy; Smith’s statements on the convoy and related issues.)

• Core Message & Grievances:
  • Defense of Property Rights: The firearms community views legal gun ownership as a fundamental right, similar to home-ownership, representing a tangible investment, an expression of self-reliance, and a means of protecting one’s family and property. (Evidence: CCFR statements; online discussions in firearms forums; interviews with gun owners).
  • Preservation of Cultural Heritage: Firearms are deeply embedded in Canadian culture and history, particularly in rural areas, playing a significant role in hunting traditions, Indigenous practices, and the “warrior ethos.” (Evidence: Articles on the history of firearms in Canada; interviews with hunters and Indigenous communities.)
  • Public Safety and Responsible Ownership: Lawful gun owners emphasize their commitment to safe gun handling, training, and compliance with existing regulations. They criticize policies that seem to target them unfairly while neglecting the core issue of criminal activity and illegal firearms trafficking. (Evidence: CCFR safety programs; statistics on gun crime vs. legal ownership; testimonials from gun owners).
  • Anti-Establishment Sentiment/Distrust of Government: The firearms community expresses deep frustration and distrust of the current Liberal government and associated narratives, particularly concerning policies like Bill C-21, the May 2020 OIC, and other legislative measures that confiscate legally owned firearms, erode their rights, and undermine the economic viability of Canada’s local firearms industry and supporting infrastructure, including ranges, sports shooting, and hunting communities.

• Alignment with “Blue Storm Rising”: Extremely high alignment on individual rights/freedoms, anti-censorship, personal responsibility, anti-establishment sentiment, and protecting Canadian heritage/identity. Strong alignment on promoting local business and bolstering a domestic manufacturing industry within Canada (firearms sector). Moderate alignment on the security/preparedness aspect. While SGT/CPC primarily focuses on enhancing military/police capabilities, the firearms community’s argument for civilian self-defense resonates with the “warrior ethos” and preparedness themes, particularly in the face of escalating threats. This is where SGT’s messaging bridges the two.

• CCFR’s Role: The Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights (CCFR) has emerged as the leading voice, defending legal gun ownership, promoting responsible firearm use through safety training initiatives, and actively challenging government policies perceived as unjust or ineffective. (Evidence: CCFR publications, legal challenges, advocacy campaigns, educational videos).

• Impact:
  • The firearms rights movement has significantly contributed to the “Comeback” narrative by: Raising awareness of policies perceived as infringing on fundamental rights. Mobilizing a significant voting bloc concerned about these issues. Strengthening the Conservative Party’s platform and messaging on freedom and individual liberty. Promoting a vision of Canada where citizens have the capacity and right to defend themselves and their communities.

• Fiscal Responsibility: Poilievre’s core message revolves around “Axe the Tax,” controlling spending, and attacking deficits/debt. Pierre “dollar-for-dollar” concept aligns perfectly with SGT’s fiscal conservatism.
• Energy & Resources: Team SGT/Danielle/Pierre/Conservative MP/Jordan Peterson strongly advocate for developing Canadian oil/gas/LNG, building pipelines, LNG terminals and aggressively opposing the Carbon Tax and policies perceived as hindering the energy sector. Poilievre is also increasingly mentioning nuclear (SMRs) as part of the solution.
• Housing: Poilievre consistently focuses on removing municipal land gatekeepers, speeding up permits, and linking federal funding to municipal housing targets – Same as Team SGT’s focus on supply-side solutions. Team SGT’s advertised for years “pod house factory/Crown land lease/Land Dollar/supply side land distribution” ideas are more radical, the problem diagnosis (gatekeepers, lack of supply) and direction (build more, faster) are highly aligned and land values are shown already to the public via Pierre video speeches on YouTube channel for 3 years now.
• Free Speech & Anti-Woke: Poilievre frequently campaigns against censorship bills (C-11, C-63), promotes “common sense,” and pushes back against identity politics and “woke” ideology, same as Team SGT’s.
• Military & Security: We advocate for increased defense spending, supporting the CAF, tougher measures on crime (bail reform, gang focus), and stronger border security. We provided detailed proposals for specific industrial bases (missile/ammo factories, modernized Rangers, specific naval upgrades), but Pierre is holding back a bit for now on the officially stated CPC policy, but the overall direction is synergistic and we agree.
• STEM & Skills Gap: Moderate Alignment. Poilievre emphasizes trades and removing barriers for foreign-trained professionals. There’s less explicit focus yet on SGT’s specific call to re-balance university funding towards STEM or empower professional STEM societies as central policy levers. The alignment is on outcomes (more skilled workers) but differs slightly on the mechanism emphasized so far.

• Food Security: We both strongly support farmers and criticize policies (like the carbon tax) that increase food costs.

• Provincial Sovereignty: Smith’s political identity is built on defending Alberta’s autonomy against federal overreach, particularly on energy and environmental policy. SGT’s Team is also pro-sovereignty.
• Energy & Resources: Smith is a fierce champion of Alberta’s oil/gas sector, pipelines, LNG, and is actively exploring SMRs and geothermal. Team SGT’s vision same as well.
• Fiscal Responsibility: Smith’s UCP government emphasizes balanced budgets and fiscal prudence within Alberta. Team SGT aligns with fiscal prudence and balanced budget.
• Smith actively promotes economic diversification in Alberta, attracting tech investment and supporting innovation hubs (like AMII).
• Danielle Smith shares our principles and Pierre’s principles. Smith’s positions are also deeply rooted in Alberta’s long-standing political identity. There is resonance and re-enforcement, and we, like many politicians around the world learned from Danielle Smith and attained the Alberta identity on the energy policy of global switch from De-Growth to Growth. Thanks Alberta. It was since 1970s that the world was turned to De-Growth and De-Constructionism, due to Philosophical Wokeism Schism of Post-Modernism, and Alberta identity Danielle Smith managed to flip the world back to Growth (meaning real math, real engineering philosophy, real modernism, real intellectual development). We’re back in business folks!!! As “age of reason” and well thought out, “structured thinking”!!!, including Team SGT.

• Individual Responsibility/Meritocracy/Anti-Victimhood: Core tenets of Peterson matches Team SGT.
• Free Speech/Anti-Woke/Anti-Ideology/Defense of Truth: Central to both SGT’s critique of modern governance/media and Peterson’s global platform.
• Critique of Bureaucracy/Gatekeeping: Administrative overreach and the stifling of competence are key tenents of Team SGT and Jordan Peterson.
• Western Values/Heritage/History: Both Team SGT and Jordan Peterson defend the importance of historical understanding and traditional Western philosophical foundations.
• Resilience/Confronting Chaos: Both Team SGT and Jordan Peterson emphasize the need to face difficulty and build strength.
• STEM/Industrial Policy: Peterson focuses on psychology, philosophy, and culture, not specific engineering projects or industrial strategy like SGT. So there is one little difference here.
• Philosophical resonance between Jordan Peterson and Team SGT. Both SGT and Peterson are reacting to similar societal trends and drawing on related intellectual traditions (Enlightenment values, meritocracy). SGT’s unique contribution is applying these principles through a STEM/engineering/security lens to propose concrete industrial and governance solutions, which Peterson doesn’t typically do. We are allies in the “culture war” but operate in different domains.

• Kevin O’Leary: Shares the focus on fiscal prudence, pro-business policies, deregulation, and innovation. Less aligned on sovereignty, social issues, or specific SGT proposals. Current support for Poilievre and anti-Trudeau stance indicate a convergence.
• Influence: Likely resonance on core business/economic principles, less direct influence on other areas.

• Core Principles & Shared Values:
  • STEM Excellence: Promoting STEM education, research, and professional development is not merely an economic strategy; it is an investment in Canada’s future. We believe that fostering a culture of innovation, driven by highly skilled scientists, engineers, technologists, technicians, and tradespeople, is crucial for addressing the complex challenges of the 21st century and ensuring Canada’s global competitiveness. (Evidence: ASTTBC/CIPS mission statements emphasizing STEM advancement; SGT articles on the skills gap and the need for STEM education reform; national reports on the growing demand for STEM professionals).
  • Ethical Conduct: Upholding the highest ethical standards and professional codes of conduct, particularly in technology, engineering, and public service, is paramount. This includes a deep commitment to public safety, environmental stewardship, and the responsible development and deployment of technology. (Evidence: Engineers Canada/CIPS codes of ethics; SGT articles on professional responsibility).
  • Evidence-Based Decision-Making: Prioritizing data-driven analysis, logical reasoning, and rigorous scientific methodology in all policy and practice is essential. This stands in contrast to approaches driven by ideology, emotions, political expediency, or narratives detached from factual evidence. (Evidence: SGT’s technically grounded analysis and critiques of policies like Bill C-21, using data and empirical research to expose flaws).
  • Public Welfare & Safety: Recognizing the vital role of professionals in safeguarding public welfare and contributing to a secure, healthy, and prosperous society is fundamental. (Evidence: Professional codes of ethics emphasizing public safety as a primary responsibility; SGT articles and videos highlighting the role of STEM professionals in addressing critical societal challenges.)
  • Professional Standards & Continuous Improvement: A belief in continuous learning, skills development, and adherence to professional standards and best practices is essential for both individual growth and the advancement of all disciplines. We strongly advocate for professional development through programs like CPD (Continuing Professional Development), ensuring that the next generation of professionals is equipped with the latest knowledge and technologies. (Evidence: ASTTBC and CIPS CPD programs; SGT’s focus on bridging the skills gap and providing up-to-date training in emerging fields.)  This includes respecting professional designations, certifications, licenses, and the established legal and regulatory frameworks that govern each profession (e.g., the Engineers and Geoscientists Act, the Information Systems Professional Act, ASTT Act)
  • Challenging the Status Quo: Professionals have a responsibility to challenge outdated systems, advocate for needed change, and resist pressures to compromise their integrity or lower their standards, even if it comes at a personal cost. This aligns with the historical role of professional organizations like ASTTBC and CIPS. (Evidence: ASTTBC’s advocacy on behalf of technologists and technicians in BC and their fight to improve legislation and expand their professional standing).
  • Mentorship: The professional community has a duty to mentor the next generation, ensuring that their collective knowledge, expertise, and values are passed on. (Evidence: CIPS mentorship programs.)
• Extremely High Alignment with SGT/”Blue Storm Rising”: These core principles, deeply ingrained in the mandates of ASTTBC, CIPS, and other professional organizations, form the very foundation of SGT’s “Blue Storm Rising” vision. SGT’s advocacy for enhanced STEM education funding (through professional societies), addressing the skills gap through practical training, prioritizing applied research with a focus onr solving real-world problems, fostering a culture of innovation, and promoting the ethical use of technology, are direct extensions of these shared values. SGT’s rigorous, data-driven, scientific approach to analyzing and critiquing policies, an advanced systems analysis applied multi-dimension-ally to all aspects of society, exemplified by the deconstruction of Bill C-21 and the May 2020 OIC (Order in Council) to enhance the gun safety in Canada, showcases their commitment to these principles.

• Director Valentin’s Multifaceted Background: Director Valentin’s diverse professional experience, as an Applied Science Technologist – Information Technology (AScT-IT), an Information Systems Professional (ISP), and a computer scientist with extensive expertise in UX research, verified/referenced by Director of Engineering at Oracle, Software Engineering Lead at Microsoft/PowerApps, and film/media project management, strengthens SGT’s credibility and deepens its connection to STEM communities. His invitation to join the advisory boards and/or provide programs evaluation feedback of ASTTBC and CIPS, after those organizations evaluated SGT’s significant professional contributions to the field, further exemplifies the high alignment between SGT and these professional bodies. Moreover, Valentin’s earlier experience managing 40-person film crews has given him valuable insight into the realities of Canada’s private sector, the labour market, and the importance of effective teamwork and project management in achieving complex goals, aligning with the practical, “builder’s philosophy” of “Blue Storm Rising.”

• Independent Media’s Role: While SGT’s advocacy often aligns with the independent media’s coverage of “Blue Storm Rising” themes, the extremely high alignment on STEM, ethics, and professional standards is primarily found within the professional communities themselves (e.g., ASTTBC, CIPS, Engineers Canada (colleagues and contributors to SGT)). The media, which may also embrace a diverse range of viewpoints, doesn’t always share the same level of emphasis on these specific principles.

• Core Message & Grievances:
  • Public Safety Crisis: Rising crime rates, repeat offenders, lenient sentencing, inadequate support from the justice system, and the increasing prevalence of gang violence and drug-related crime in Canadian cities have eroded public trust and made communities feel less safe. (Evidence: Crime statistics; reports from police associations; interviews with officers; media coverage of crime and public safety issues).
  • Inadequate Resources & Political Interference: Police forces across Canada are struggling with understaffing, budget constraints, and policies that seem to prioritize political optics over effective crime prevention. The focus on banning legally owned firearms, exemplified by Bill C-21, diverts resources and attention away from addressing the root causes of violent crime, such as gang activity, drug trafficking, and illegal firearms. (Evidence: Police union statements on resource needs; reports on police staffing levels; analysis of government spending on policing vs. other initiatives; media coverage of Bill C-21 debates.) Respect for Law & Order/Accountability for Criminals: Police officers are committed to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that criminals are held accountable for their actions. They advocate for tougher sentencing laws, bail reform, and a justice system that prioritizes public safety and the rights of victims. (Evidence: Statements by police chiefs and associations on crime and sentencing; public opinion polls on attitudes towards crime and punishment.)
  • Warrior Ethos/Protective Instinct: Many in law enforcement embody a “warrior ethos” – a sense of duty, courage, and a willingness to protect their communities, often at personal risk. This value system aligns with traditional Canadian values of service and sacrifice. (Evidence: Stories of police heroism; interviews with officers discussing their motivations; police training programs emphasizing courage and duty.) Community Partnerships: Effective policing relies on trust and cooperation between law enforcement and local communities. Policies perceived as alienating communities or undermining police authority make it harder for officers to do their jobs and build positive relationships with the people they serve. (Evidence: Community policing initiatives; reports on police-community relations).
• Alignment with “Blue Storm Rising”:
  • Extremely High Alignment on: public safety, respect for law and order, accountability for criminals, anti-establishment sentiment (distrust of government/media), support for traditional Canadian values, including the “warrior ethos,” and the need for enhanced national security measures to protect communities. High Alignment on fiscal responsibility and efficient resource allocation. While respecting existing budgetary constraints, the police have consistently advocated for increased funding for front-line officers, technology, and training, which reflects SGT/CPC’s prioritization of spending on essential services over administrative bloat or ideologically driven programs.
  • Impact on “Comeback” Narrative: The challenges faced by Canadian police, coupled with rising crime rates across the country, have significantly strengthened the “Comeback” narrative and contributed to growing support for the Conservative Party. By highlighting the public safety crisis, advocating for “tough on crime” policies, and giving a voice to law enforcement officers who feel unheard and unsupported by the current Liberal government, the police have reinforced the Conservative Party’s message and contributed to their rising popularity in the polls.

• Core Message & Concerns:
  • Defense Vulnerabilities & Military Decline: Decades of underfunding, equipment procurement delays or cancellations, and neglect have left Canada’s military lagging behind its allies and ill-prepared for evolving threats (cyberwarfare, autonomous weapons systems, great power conflict). The declining number of personnel, aging equipment, and lack of investment in next-generation technologies have eroded the CAF’s operational readiness and capacity to respond effectively to national security challenges. (Evidence: DND reports on budget and personnel shortages; auditor general reports on military procurement; analyses comparing Canada’s military spending and capabilities to those of other NATO allies; media coverage of military issues.)
  • Erosion of “Warrior Ethos”: The focus on identity politics, “woke” ideology, and diversity quotas within the CAF has undermined traditional military values — such as duty, honour, courage, sacrifice, and a warrior’s mindset. This ideological shift not only reduces operational effectiveness but erodes the very identity and culture of the CAF, potentially impacting recruitment and retention.
  • Lack of Political Support & Strategic Foresight: The current government’s lack of clear articulation of Canada’s strategic defense priorities and its perceived unwillingness to provide the CAF with the resources and autonomy it needs to fulfill its mandate have created a sense of frustration and disillusionment among military personnel. (Evidence: Interviews and public statements by current and former CAF members, military experts, and defense analysts criticizing government policy).
  • National Security Risks: A weakened military makes Canada more vulnerable to a range of threats, including foreign interference, cyber-attacks, territorial disputes (particularly in the Arctic), and the growing assertiveness of authoritarian regimes like China and Russia. It also diminishes Canada’s ability to contribute meaningfully to NATO and other international alliances, eroding its global standing. (Evidence: Geopolitical analysis of global power dynamics and emerging threats; reports on Canada’s role in NATO and international security operations).
• Alignment with “Blue Storm Rising”:
  • Extremely High Alignment on: national sovereignty, national security, military modernization and investment, preparedness for emerging threats, the importance of the “warrior ethos,” and push-back against government policies that weaken Canada’s defense capabilities. High Alignment on fiscal responsibility (redirecting spending towards essential national security needs), STEM (promoting technical skills, innovation, and research within the military), and fostering a strong sense of national identity and pride within the CAF.

• Impact on “Comeback” Narrative:
  • The CAF’s challenges and the growing public concern about national security have played a crucial role in the “Comeback” narrative: By highlighting Canada’s defense vulnerabilities, they have reinforced the need for a stronger, more capable military. By advocating for increased military spending and investment in advanced technologies, they have bolstered support for a more assertive Canadian foreign policy. By challenging the government’s ideological approach to military affairs, they have resonated with Canadians who prioritize traditional values and operational effectiveness over identity politics. By giving a voice to military personnel and defense experts, they have countered the government’s narratives and exposed the true state of Canada’s military readiness, or lack thereof.

• Italy (Meloni): High resonance on national sovereignty, cultural identity, border control, stability focus. Meloni’s government also faces economic/debt challenges. Conservative focus on national industrial base and energy independence aligns well with Italy’s needs. Strong thematic resonance within a global shift towards national conservatism. Borders policy change across Europe, not just Italy, after decades of open borders.
• Many European leaders, like Nigel in UK, are adopting the Blue Wave campaign points to fix system issues, as the challenges face by Canada (Ex: broken country) are used in other European nations, but we don’t want to name too many political examples so as to not jeopardize them their leadership.
• Germany (Weidel/AfD), France (Le Pen): Resonance on immigration critique, energy policy realism (pushback against overly rapid Green transitions), national identity. These movements are driven by deep-seated national concerns predating SGT. Thematic resonance.
• Eastern Europe (Poland, Hungary, Romania, etc.): High resonance on national sovereignty, cultural preservation, suspicion of global institutions, and increasingly, defense focus. These countries live the history SGT references (Soviet/communist past, recent conflicts). Strong thematic resonance, but policy here was developed without SGT documents, but independently.
• Australia/UK (Conservative Elements): Moderate resonance on national security (AUKUS), resource economies, fiscal concerns, pushback against “woke” ideology. SGT’s emphasis on a domestic industrial base for defense resonate given supply chain concerns highlighted by recent global events. Possible indirect influence through shared Anglosphere conservative networks, but unlikely direct copying of SGT’s detailed Canadian platform.
• Example: SGT’s “Blue Storm Rising” platform taps into and articulates themes (national sovereignty, industrial resilience, energy realism, critique of globalism/woke ideology, need for strong defense) that are gaining traction among conservative and nationalist movements globally. However, these international movements have their own distinct origins and drivers. The similarities represent a shared diagnosis of contemporary problems and a resonance of ideas across borders.

THE ONE