Using Policy Outcomes to Identify Problematic Parliamentarians: A Closer Look at Key Failures in Immigration, Housing, Diversity, Inclusion and Firearms Legislation

Hi Rebel News,

Title: Jagmeet Singh sides with Poilievre against Trudeau’s foreign interference gag order https://youtu.be/iurBI2Qpfv8?feature=shared

Our team watched your recent video on the foreign interference allegations involving 11 parliamentarians. We believe that Paul Chiang is a relevant educational case study for investigation due to his connections to critical policy areas where Canadian national initiatives have failed spectacularly. These failures pose significant concerns for national security, economic stability, and Canadian cultural identity. Below is a more in-depth look at these key issues:

1. Immigration Policies and Shifting Demographics

As the Parliamentary Secretary for Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship, Paul Chiang is at the center of Canada’s evolving immigration strategies. In recent years, the focus has shifted heavily toward Eastern nations like China, India, and the Middle East. This has had profound impacts on Canada’s demographics and significant increase in tension via this identity change resultant from this re-alignment. Historically, immigration policy had a stronger focus on Western nations, and was embedded and aligned within western nation ecosytem, aligning more with Canada’s Western cultural and political values (Ex: Canadian Christians, South America, Central America, America Latin World Christians, and Europe).

The shift in prioritization toward Eastern nations could be seen as aligning more with foreign interests, raising questions about whether Canada’s long-term identity is being altered, the balance altered, in favour of external influences. Public trust is eroded when immigration appears disconnected from the will of Canadians. Several analysts and citizens have expressed concerns about this direction, arguing that it disrupts the fabric of Canadian society and could compromise social cohesion, especially as cultural and political values from countries like China and India or Middle East don’t always align with traditional Canadian values and spiritually bonded cultures, philosophically bonded cultures, historically bonded cultures, no-conflict history & shared linguistic & cultural roots.

Example: In 2021, nearly 32% of Canada’s immigrants came from India, with significant numbers from China and the Philippines. These trends contribute to growing concerns over cultural assimilation, national security, and potential economic displacement for native-born Canadians. Such policies, supported or overseen by officials like Paul Chiang, demand closer scrutiny.

Source: House of Commons of Canada, Statistics Canada

Here are some relevant statistics for 2021:

India: Nearly 32% of Canada’s immigrants.
China: Around 8.6%.
Philippines: Approximately 4.3%.

In comparison, the percentage of immigrants from Europe and the United States was much smaller:

United States: About 3% of all immigrants to Canada in 2021.
Europe (including all European countries combined): Roughly 10% of immigrants came from Europe, with notable numbers from the United Kingdom, France, and other EU nations.

On average, each European country contributed approximately 0.23% of the total immigrants to Canada in 2021, based on the 10% of immigrants coming from all 44 European countries combined. 

These figures reflect the shift in Canadian immigration policy over recent years, with an increasing emphasis on immigration from Middle East, Africa and Asia, but particularly India and China, while immigration from Western nations like the U.S. and European countries has remained very low by traditional standards. This demographic direction has sparked concerns about cultural assimilation and the long-term impact on Canadian national identity, as discussed in this review.

There is also evidence online of individuals showing a reluctance to assimilate to Canadian standards, displaying little interest in engaging with Canadian cultural norms, such as reading Christian literature, studying Western philosophy, adopting Western culinary practices, or participating in Western banking systems. Instead, there seems to be an expectation for Canadians to conform to Eastern cultural practices within their own country. This expectation is unprecedented and highly unusual in historical contexts, unless viewed through the lens of a hostile takeover or significant external influence attempting to reshape the national identity from within.

2. Housing Crisis Under His Oversight in Diversity and Inclusion

While serving as the Parliamentary Secretary for Housing, Diversity, and Inclusion, Paul Chiang was part of the government apparatus overseeing a key file that has seen spectacular failure. Despite billions in promised investments to address the housing crisis, affordable housing remains a distant reality for many Canadians. The lack of progress in expanding housing supply, particularly affordable homes, has driven real estate prices to historic highs — especially in urban centers like Toronto and Vancouver.

Under Chiang’s watch, the government’s housing strategy failed to tackle the core issue of supply, leaving millennials and young families increasingly priced out of home-ownership. The shortage of available land, combined with speculative investments from both foreign and domestic players, has created a housing market crisis that disproportionately impacts lower-income Canadians. This failure is indicative of poor policy management, as the government did not effectively address the supply-demand imbalance despite recognizing the problem.

Fact: Home prices in Toronto and Vancouver have risen more than 40% in the past five years, while wages have stagnated. Government initiatives aimed at reducing costs, such as the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive, have had little tangible impact on affordability, further worsening the crisis. This failure calls into question the effectiveness of leadership in this area, especially under Chiang’s purview. Sources: House of Commons of Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC)

3. Firearms Legislation and Canadian Identity

Paul Chiang’s involvement in Bill C-21 and the firearms ban speaks to his role in policies that many see as eroding core Canadian values. His name appears in official documentation for the November 17, 2022 amendments related to this legislation (C-21 G-46, Ref.: 12071129, Clause/Article 73). https://firearmrights.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/The-List-G46-final.pdf

The government’s attempt to ban hundreds of firearms — including hunting rifles — has met with fierce opposition from sports shooters, hunters, and indigenous communities who argue that this is not just a legal issue but one that attacks the very identity of rural and traditional Canadians.

Canada’s firearms culture is deeply tied to its history, with responsible ownership and hunting traditions dating back centuries. By undermining these rights, policies like Bill C-21 appear to disregard the heritage and cultural practices of many Canadians. This legislation also demonstrates poor policy planning, as it was criticized for being too broad and including firearms that are essential for hunting and rural life.

Example: Some of the rifles included in the initial ban list were common hunting firearms, which led to a significant backlash and forced the government to walk back parts of the policy. This raises questions about the depth of understanding — or the lack thereof — among those driving these policies.

Sources: Library of Parliament, National Firearms Association

4. National Security Concerns: Impact on Canada’s Defense Capabilities

The broader implications of firearms restrictions under Bill C-71, the May 2020 OIC, and Bill C-21 extend beyond cultural heritage to national security.

Many countries, including the U.S., Poland, Ukraine, Czech, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, recognize the value of an armed civilian population as a crucial component of national defense, especially in times of crisis. Disarming law-abiding citizens through sweeping legislation could weaken Canada’s internal defense capabilities, particularly as geopolitical tensions rise, benefiting foreign interests.

Canada’s military, while professional, is relatively small compared to its population size. As of 2023, there are approximately 68,000 active and reserve military members, with only a fraction being combat-ready infantry, about 7000. This is no match and easily overcome by almost any nation on Earth. Meanwhile, there are over 2 million licensed firearms owners across the country, with 20 million firearms, many of whom could theoretically serve as a supplementary defense force in the event of an external threat (helping to secure a vast 10 million km land mass in reality).

Example: Poland and Ukraine have leveraged civilian militias to defend their borders during times of conflict. In contrast, Canada’s disarmament approach could leave it without a comparable civilian defense capability in a time of national emergency. Sources: Public Safety Canada, Canadian Armed Forces, NATO

By limiting access to firearms, the government risks leaving Canada more vulnerable to potential crises, especially given current global tensions involving Russia and China, and especially since Canada only has “one” “useful” security agreement in operation, the NATO agreement, and this is quite insufficient from a reliability planning point of view to guard 10 million square km of land.

NORAD, while vital for the joint defense of North American airspace and maritime regions, does not offer broad military guarantees similar to NATO’s Article 5. It focuses on protecting the continent from aerospace threats, but its scope is limited in addressing modern global conflicts. With rising military powers in the East, such as China and Russia, and the economic instability in both the U.S. and Europe, Canada faces an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.

One defense pact like NATO, which provides mutual protection, might not be sufficient for Canada’s long-term security. The global power balance is shifting, and the value systems of the 21st century make it harder to rally public support for military interventions. Unlike during the Cold War, asking people to sacrifice their lives for allied nations, including Canada, requires a stronger justification, as individualism and national interest often dominate public sentiment today.

Given these evolving challenges, Canada might need to expand or reconsider its military partnerships to ensure its security in a multi-polar world. This could include deepening relationships beyond NATO to provide more comprehensive defense assurances, but the military agreements of any worth would not want Canada as a partner.

Conclusion: Policy Outcomes and National Security

When you consider these critical areas — national defense, housing, immigration, and Canadian identity — the outcomes of these policies seem to disproportionately benefit foreign interests and weaken the foundational pillars of Canadian society. Policies that disarm responsible citizens, fail to provide affordable housing, and shift Canada’s demographics without public consent raise serious questions about the intentions behind these decision

Paul Chiang appears to have had significant influence in the domains immigration, housing, and diversity policy and is connected to the most controversial firearms battle policies, based on his roles and involvement in various policy areas:

Immigration Policies and Shifting Demographics: Immigration: As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship, he plays a key role in shaping Canada’s immigration policies, particularly in recent shifts toward Eastern nations. Chiang played a pivotal role in shaping immigration strategies. These policies have been criticized for their impact on Canada’s cultural and demographic composition, especially due to the shift toward prioritizing immigration from Eastern nations, which some argue has caused social tension and a perceived shift in national identity. This area is key to assessing his policy influence.
Housing Crisis and Diversity: Housing: He was also Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Diversity during the housing crisis, where government efforts faced criticism for lack of progress on affordability. As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing, Diversity, and Inclusion, Chiang had a direct role during a period of skyrocketing housing prices and unaffordability, particularly in cities like Toronto and Vancouver. Despite significant government investment, the lack of affordable housing options has been a major failure under his oversight, with rising property prices exacerbating economic inequality.
Firearms Legislation and Canadian Identity: Firearms: His name appears on The List – G46 for Bill C-21 amendments. https://firearmrights.ca/full-list-of-firearms-banned-through-c-21-revealed/

His involvement in Bill C-21 and the firearms ban amendments, particularly regarding the broad and controversial inclusion of hunting rifles, has raised concerns about overreach and the erosion of Canadian rural and cultural identity (307 pages of property bans). This legislative action, under Chiang’s watch, affected millions of lawful firearms owners and contributed to a growing public debate about the role of government in regulating Canadian traditions and rights.

Note: Paul Chiang and Pam Damoff are connected through their roles within the Canadian government, particularly in areas related to public safety, firearms legislation, and diversity.

Given his roles in these areas, Chiang is implicated in policy decisions that have been criticized as detrimental to national security, cultural identity, and economic stability. These issues, combined with concerns over foreign influence, warrant deeper scrutiny.

Rebel News, thank you for your continued work in exposing important issues in Canada. Hopefully, with the template such as we have shown here, Canadian citizens are able to try to figure out who the bad parliamentarians are in Canada, by following a similar process.

While we do not want to unfairly or accidentally accuse Paul Chiang or anyone else of direct wrongdoing, the evidence points to significant policy failures in areas where he has had influence. These failures, coupled with growing concerns about foreign interference in Canadian politics, demand a thorough analysis and possibly even investigation (given that the country is broken). This is not only the duty of every citizen, but it is especially the public safety professional duty to let people know what evidence we come across if it is against the public welfare and the public interest being held paramount.

We believe it is the responsibility of citizens and journalists to reverse-engineer policy outcomes and scrutinize those involved in shaping policies that harm Canada’s long-term stability, cultural security and balanced properly for public safety purposes with low probability conflict driven immigration which can be determined by war historical analysis and data science, and national security. With critical national security, economic, and cultural issues at stake, we hope you will consider delving deeper into this matter.

Best regards, Team SGT