It would generally be easier for a navy to attempt an invasion of British Columbia (BC) from China than from India for several key reasons:
1. Geographical Proximity and Distance:
1.1. From China:
The direct distance from China’s eastern coast to BC is approximately 5,000 to 6,000 nautical miles, which allows for a shorter and more manageable journey across the Pacific Ocean.
1.2. From India:
The distance from Indian ports to BC is much greater, at around 10,000 to 12,000 nautical miles, if taking the westward route. This involves navigating through the Arabian Sea, potentially the Suez Canal, the Mediterranean Sea, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Panama Canal before entering the Pacific.
Alternatively, India can head eastward through the Indian Ocean, pass through the Strait of Malacca, then cross the South China Sea to enter the Pacific. However, this route still covers approximately 8,000 to 10,000 nautical miles and faces other challenges like chokepoints and regional geopolitical tensions.
1.3. Implication:
A shorter route from China means faster travel times, reduced logistical challenges, and less time for enemy detection or interception. Even with India’s eastward option, the route from China is still shorter and more direct.
2. Strategic Oceanic Access:
2.1. China:
China has direct access to the Pacific Ocean, which borders British Columbia. The Pacific is one of the most strategically significant bodies of water for naval operations, allowing for a relatively straightforward approach to the west coast of North America.
2.2. India:
India, being primarily in the Indian Ocean, must either navigate through the Suez Canal or the Cape of Good Hope to enter the Atlantic, then cross the Panama Canal to reach the Pacific if going westward. Going eastward, India would pass through the Strait of Malacca and the South China Sea, which can be problematic due to potential geopolitical tensions, especially with China’s dominance in that region.
2.3. Implication:
China’s direct access to the Pacific gives it a more favourable position for naval operations targeting the west coast of North America, whereas India’s options are constrained by both geography and potential choke-points or tensions.
3. Logistical Challenges:
China: Due to the shorter distance, China can supply and sustain its naval forces more effectively during an operation. Resupply, repair, and refuelling points are critical for a successful naval campaign. China also has several nearby bases in the Pacific, such as in the South China Sea, which could assist in these efforts.
India: Whether taking the eastward or westward route, India would face greater logistical difficulties over such long distances, requiring more resupply missions, which would slow down the operation and increase the risk of detection or interception by enemy forces or allied powers.
Implication: Logistically, an invasion from China would be more feasible due to proximity and existing naval infrastructure in the Pacific region, while India’s routes pose significant logistical hurdles.
4. Naval Strength and Presence:
China: The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is one of the largest and most rapidly modernizing navies in the world, with a growing presence in the Pacific. It already maintains a significant number of aircraft carriers, submarines, and other naval assets within striking range of the west coast of North America.
India: The Indian Navy, while capable, is more regionally focused in the Indian Ocean and has a lesser presence in the Pacific. Its logistical and operational reach is more limited than that of the PLAN.
Implication: China’s stronger naval presence and capabilities in the Pacific make it a more likely candidate for an invasion attempt, while India’s focus and reach are more limited.
5. Political and Diplomatic Factors:
China: China has a more direct interest in the Pacific, with significant territorial claims and ambitions in the region (e.g., South China Sea). An invasion of BC, while unlikely in the current geopolitical environment, would be more feasible for China due to its existing focus on Pacific dominance.
India: India’s strategic interests are largely centered on the Indian Ocean region, and it has a lesser stake in the Pacific. Additionally, India has historically maintained a more non-aligned and defensive posture compared to China’s assertive geopolitical strategies.
Implication: China’s ambitions and presence in the Pacific give it a stronger strategic rationale for operations in this region, whereas India’s focus remains more on its immediate surroundings.
6. Conclusion:
An invasion of British Columbia would be much easier from China due to the shorter distance, direct access to the Pacific Ocean, better logistical support, and a stronger naval presence in the region. While India could theoretically attempt an invasion by either an eastward or westward route, both options present significant geographical, logistical, and strategic challenges. China remains the more feasible threat from a naval standpoint. However, the feasibility of any such invasion would still depend on broader political and military factors, including alliances, deterrents, and defensive capabilities.
To see our Donate Page, click https://skillsgaptrainer.com/donate
To see our YouTube Channel, click https://www.youtube.com/@skillsgaptrainer